50-State Law Survey
State Consumer Privacy Laws by US Jurisdiction
A side-by-side comparison of how each US state regulates consumer personal information — who is covered, what a compliant privacy policy must contain, whether consumers can sue, and who enforces the law. Each row links to the full practice note for that jurisdiction. This is legal research, not legal advice.
| Jurisdiction | Summary | Main law | Privacy policy required? | Last reviewed | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California | If your business meets a CCPA threshold, you must post a CCPA-compliant privacy policy, honor consumer rights and opt-out signals, put statutory terms in your vendor contracts, and maintain reasonable security — or face CPPA/AG enforcement and, after a breach, consumer suits. | Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.100 et seq. (CCPA, as amended by the CPRA) | yes | ||
| |||||
| Colorado | If you do business in Colorado and meet the 100,000-consumer (or 25,000 plus data-sale) threshold — nonprofits included — the CPA requires a privacy notice, a universal opt-out mechanism, processor contracts, and consent to process sensitive data, enforced by the Attorney General with no consumer lawsuits and no cure period. | Colo. Rev. Stat. §§ 6-1-1301 et seq. (Colorado Privacy Act) | Yes — a reasonably accessible, clear, and meaningful notice with statutorily fixed contents | ||
| |||||
| Connecticut | If you meet the 100,000-consumer (or 25,000 plus data-sale) threshold in Connecticut, the CTDPA requires a privacy notice, recognition of universal opt-out signals, processor contracts, and consent for sensitive data — enforced by the Attorney General, with no consumer lawsuits and a cure period that expired at the end of 2024. | Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 42-515 et seq. (Connecticut Data Privacy Act) | Yes — a reasonably accessible, clear, and meaningful notice with statutorily fixed contents | ||
| |||||
| Iowa | If you meet the 100,000-consumer (or 25,000 plus majority-data-sale) threshold in Iowa, the ICDPA requires a privacy notice, processor contracts, and notice plus an opportunity to opt out before processing sensitive data — but not opt-in consent or a universal opt-out signal — enforced by the Attorney General with a 90-day cure period and no consumer lawsuits. | Iowa Code §§ 715D.1 et seq. (Iowa Consumer Data Protection Act) | Yes — a reasonably accessible, clear, and meaningful notice with statutorily fixed contents | ||
| |||||
| Montana | If you meet the 25,000-consumer (or 15,000 plus over-25%-data-sale) threshold in Montana, the MCDPA requires a privacy notice, opt-in consent to process sensitive data, recognition of a universal opt-out preference signal, and processor contracts — enforced by the Attorney General, with no consumer lawsuits and, since the 2025 amendments, no general right to cure before penalties of up to $7,500 per violation. | Mont. Code Ann. §§ 30-14-2801 et seq. (codified short title Consumer Data Privacy Act; commonly the Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act, or MCDPA) | Yes — a reasonably accessible, clear, and meaningful notice with statutorily fixed contents | ||
| |||||
| Oregon | If you meet the 100,000-consumer (or 25,000 plus 25%-data-sale-revenue) threshold in Oregon, the OCPA requires a privacy notice with prescribed contents, opt-in consent to process sensitive data, recognition of a universal opt-out signal, and processor contracts — enforced by the Attorney General with civil penalties up to $7,500 per violation, no consumer lawsuits, and no general right to cure after January 1, 2026. | Or. Rev. Stat. §§ 646A.570–646A.589 (Oregon Consumer Privacy Act) | Yes — a reasonably accessible, clear, and meaningful notice with statutorily fixed contents | ||
| |||||
| Texas | If you do business in Texas and are not an SBA small business, the TDPSA requires a specific privacy notice, opt-in consent to process sensitive data, and processor contracts — enforced solely by the Attorney General, with no consumer lawsuits. | Tex. Bus. & Com. Code ch. 541 (Texas Data Privacy and Security Act) | Yes — a reasonably accessible and clear notice with statutorily fixed contents | ||
| |||||
| Utah | The UCPA covers only larger businesses ($25M+ revenue plus a volume threshold). Covered controllers must post a privacy notice, give notice and an opt-out before processing sensitive data, sign processor contracts, and honor opt-outs — enforced by the Attorney General after a 30-day cure, with no consumer lawsuits. | Utah Code §§ 13-61-101 et seq. (Utah Consumer Privacy Act) | Yes — a reasonably accessible and clear notice with statutorily fixed contents | ||
| |||||
| Virginia | If you meet the 100,000-consumer (or 25,000 plus majority-data-sale) threshold in Virginia, the VCDPA requires a privacy notice, opt-in consent to process sensitive data, and processor contracts — enforced by the Attorney General with a permanent 30-day cure period and no consumer lawsuits. | Va. Code §§ 59.1-575 et seq. (Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act) | Yes — a reasonably accessible, clear, and meaningful notice with statutorily fixed contents | ||
| |||||