Employee Restrictive Covenant Agreement
Cover Terms
The terms below are incorporated into and form part of this agreement.
| Employer | [Legal name of the employer] |
| Employee | [Full legal name of the employee] |
| Employee Title / Position | |
| Effective Date | [Effective date of this agreement] |
| Governing Law | Michigan |
| Confidentiality | |
| Trade Secrets Duration | Perpetual |
| Other Confidential Information Duration | 24 months |
| Employee Non-Solicitation | |
| Duration | 24 monthsMarket benchmark 24 months · modal of 67 filed agreementsReference only — not part of this agreement. Michigan sets no statutory cap on duration; reasonableness turns on the state's general restrictive-covenant reasonableness analysis rather than a fixed number. 24 months matches the modal employee non-solicit term observed in benchmarked, publicly-filed employee agreements; 12 months is the common lighter alternative for this least-scrutinized covenant in the family, which counsel should size to the employer's actual protectable interest.
|
| Customer Non-Solicitation | |
| Duration | 12 monthsMarket benchmark 12 months · modal of 67 filed agreementsReference only — not part of this agreement. Michigan sets no statutory cap; a customer non-solicit maps directly onto the customer-relationship interest Michigan protects and is often the better instrument than a full non-compete. 12 months is the lighter side of the near-even 12/24-month split observed in benchmarked, publicly-filed employee agreements — a conservative duration counsel should size to the actual customer relationships protected.
|
| Non-Competition | |
| Duration | 12 monthsMarket benchmark 12 months · modal of 70 filed agreementsReference only — not part of this agreement. Michigan imposes no statutory cap on duration; a court weighs duration, geography, and line of business together against the employer's reasonable competitive business interest, so there is no safe-harbor number. 12 months matches the modal non-compete term observed in benchmarked, publicly-filed employee agreements — a conservative default counsel should size to the actual role and market rather than copy from another form.
|
| Restricted Territory | the geographic area in which Employee provided servicesState-law basis the geographic area in which Employee provided servicesReference only — not part of this agreement. Tied to the employee's actual service area. Michigan imposes no statutory cap on territory, but its leading overbreadth decision faulted an unlimited-geography restriction and rejected an unlimited right to restrict clients' business choices; a narrower area genuinely needed to protect the interest is far easier to defend. |
| Competitive Business | [Description of the business activities that constitute competition with the employer.] |
| Specified Competitors | |
| Consideration for Restrictive Covenants | Employee's continued at-will employment, together with the compensation and the access to Confidential Information that Employer provides Employee under this agreement, which the parties agree are given in exchange for the restrictive covenantsState-law basis Employee's continued at-will employment, together with the compensation and the access to Confidential Information that Employer provides Employee under this agreement, which the parties agree are given in exchange for the restrictive covenantsReference only — not part of this agreement. The default recites continued at-will employment plus the compensation and confidential-information access the agreement itself provides. Continued employment is sufficient only where the worker is genuinely at will; counsel should replace it with a specific negotiated benefit (a raise, bonus, promotion, or new confidential access) whenever the worker has just-cause protection or an employment contract. |
| No Business with Covered Customers | |
| Duration | 12 months |
| Non-Investment | |
| Duration | 12 months |
| Non-Disparagement | |
| Duration | 24 months |
Standard Terms
1. Defined Terms
“Competitive Business” means the business activities described in Cover Terms under Competitive Business.
“Confidential Information” means non-public information relating to Employer's business, including trade secrets, customer lists, pricing, business processes, technical data, and strategic plans, but excluding information that becomes public through no fault of Employee and excluding the general knowledge, skill, and experience Employee acquired during employment.
“Covered Customers” means customers, vendors, referral sources, and business partners with whom Employee had material contact or for whom Employee had responsibility during the 12 months before termination of employment.
“Covered Employees” means employees with whom Employee worked or whom Employee managed during the 12 months before termination of employment.
“Passive Public Holdings” means ownership of securities of a publicly traded company representing less than five percent of any class of such company's securities, and interests in diversified mutual funds, index funds, and exchange-traded funds that may hold securities of a Competitive Business.
“Protected Interests” means the reasonable competitive business interests a Michigan covenant may protect under MCL § 445.774a(1), namely Employer's Confidential Information, Employer's trade secrets as defined by the Michigan Uniform Trade Secrets Act (MCL § 445.1902(d)), and Employer's relationships and goodwill with its customers, patients, referral sources, and business partners, but not Employer's interest in avoiding ordinary competition and not the general knowledge or skill of Employee.
“Restricted Period” means the duration specified in Cover Terms for each covenant, beginning on the date Employee's employment with Employer ends for any reason.
“Restricted Territory” means the geographic area described in Cover Terms under Restricted Territory.
“Solicit” means to directly or indirectly contact, approach, induce, encourage, or provide Confidential Information to any person or entity for the purpose of diverting business away from Employer, but does not include responding to general advertisements or unsolicited inquiries not initiated by Employee.
“Trade Secrets” has the meaning given in the Michigan Uniform Trade Secrets Act, MCL § 445.1902(d).
2. Recitals and Reasonable Competitive Business Interests
Employer and Employee acknowledge that each restrictive covenant in this agreement is intended to protect one or more of Employer's Protected Interests and to impose no restraint greater than is required for that protection. The parties acknowledge that each covenant is intended to protect against Employee gaining an unfair advantage in competition with Employer, not to bar ordinary competition, not to prohibit Employee from using general knowledge or skill, and to be reasonable as to its duration, geographical area, and the type of employment or line of business. Employer would not provide Employee with access to these Protected Interests absent the protections in this agreement. This agreement is an employee restrictive covenant; a covenant ancillary to the sale of a business or between businesses is outside the scope of this agreement.
3. Timing, Consideration, and Employee Acknowledgements
The parties acknowledge that this agreement is supported by consideration, which the parties identify as Employee's continued at-will employment, together with the compensation and the access to Confidential Information that Employer provides Employee under this agreement, which the parties agree are given in exchange for the restrictive covenants. Where Employee is a genuine at-will employee, the parties agree that continued employment is sufficient consideration for the covenants; where Employee is a just-cause or contract employee, the parties agree that continued employment alone is not sufficient and that separate identifiable consideration supports the covenants. Employee acknowledges having had the opportunity to consult with independent legal counsel before signing this agreement. Employee acknowledges that the restrictions in this agreement are reasonable and necessary to protect Employer's Protected Interests, and understands that supporting consideration establishes only that the covenants are supported, not that they are reasonable — each covenant must independently be reasonable as to its duration, geography, and line of business. This agreement is effective as of the Effective Date listed in Cover Terms.
Drafting Note Consideration
Continued employment alone is sufficient consideration for a Michigan covenant only where the worker is genuinely at will. Where the worker is a just-cause or contract employee, a covenant supported by nothing more than continued employment is void, because refusing to sign would not have been just cause for termination, so a covenant in that setting stands only on separate, identifiable consideration such as a signing or retention bonus, a raise, a promotion, or new confidential access .
4. Confidential Information and Trade Secret Protection
Employee must treat all Confidential Information as strictly confidential. Employee must not use or disclose Confidential Information except as required to perform authorized job duties or with Employer's prior written consent. Employee's obligations regarding trade secrets continue in perpetuity, for as long as the information remains a trade secret. Employee's obligations regarding other Confidential Information continue for the period specified in Cover Terms. This confidentiality obligation is intended to operate alongside, and independent of, any restrictive covenant, and does not restrict Employee's use of the general knowledge, skill, and experience Employee acquired during employment.
Drafting Note Trade-secret protection as a covenant backstop
Confidentiality and trade-secret protection run independent of any covenant and outlast it: a trade-secret obligation holds for as long as the information keeps the secrecy that makes it a trade secret, and the Michigan Uniform Trade Secrets Act supplies remedies for misappropriation whether or not a non-compete survives . Return, deletion, and certification mechanics matter here because they are part of the reasonable secrecy efforts a trade secret requires, so a program that fails to reclaim confidential material can forfeit trade-secret status altogether. Fee exposure runs both ways: the non-compete statute carries no fee award, while the trade-secret act lets a court award fees to the prevailing party for a bad-faith misappropriation claim or willful and malicious misappropriation, so an aggressive or unfounded misappropriation theory carries its own downside .
5. Permitted Disclosures and Protected Conduct
Nothing in this agreement prohibits Employee from: (a) reporting possible violations of law to any government agency, including the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, or any other federal, state, or local agency; (b) making disclosures protected under whistleblower provisions of any law; (c) discussing wages, hours, or other terms and conditions of employment as protected by applicable law, including Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. § 157); (d) testifying truthfully in legal proceedings; or (e) filing a sealed complaint in court using Confidential Information without liability. Pursuant to the Defend Trade Secrets Act (18 U.S.C. § 1833(b)), Employee may not be held criminally or civilly liable for disclosing a trade secret in confidence to a government official or attorney solely for the purpose of reporting or investigating a suspected violation of law, or in a sealed court filing.
6. Return, Deletion, and Certification of Company Property
Upon termination of employment, Employee must promptly return to Employer all documents, devices, files, credentials, and other materials containing or relating to Confidential Information. Where permitted, Employee must permanently delete electronic copies of Confidential Information from personal devices and accounts. Employee must certify compliance with this section in writing upon Employer's request. The parties intend that these return, deletion, and certification mechanics serve as part of Employer's reasonable efforts to maintain the secrecy of its trade secrets.
7. Non-Solicitation of Employees
During the Restricted Period, Employee must not Solicit, recruit, hire, or attempt to hire any Covered Employee. This restriction does not prohibit Employee from providing a professional reference upon request or from hiring a person who responds to a general advertisement not directed specifically at Employer's employees. This covenant reaches only Covered Employees during the Restricted Period and is drawn no broader than necessary to protect Employer's workforce stability and goodwill.
8. Non-Solicitation of Customers, Vendors, Referral Sources, and Business Partners
During the Restricted Period, Employee must not Solicit the business of any Covered Customer. This covenant protects Employer's reasonable competitive business interest in its customer relationships and the confidential information behind them; it reaches only Covered Customers with whom Employee had material contact and is no broader than necessary, because a non-solicit that followed every customer Employer has ever billed would protect against ordinary competition rather than an unfair advantage. Together with the confidentiality and trade-secret protections in this agreement, this covenant is often a stronger and more readily enforceable protection than a broad non-compete.
9. No Business with Covered Customers
During the Restricted Period, Employee must not accept, service, or do business with any Covered Customer, regardless of whether Employee or the Covered Customer first initiated contact. This restriction is broader than non-solicitation because it applies even if the Covered Customer approaches Employee, and it restrains the Covered Customer's choice as much as Employee's conduct. Because an employer has no unlimited right to restrict the business choices of its clients, this covenant is sized tightly to the goodwill it protects and reaches only Covered Customers with whom Employee had material contact.
10. Non-Competition
During the Restricted Period, Employee must not engage in, be employed by, consult for, or have an active ownership interest in any Competitive Business within the Restricted Territory. This covenant exists to protect Employer's Protected Interests — its Confidential Information, trade secrets, and customer relationships — and not to restrain ordinary competition or Employee's general knowledge or skill. The parties intend this covenant to protect a reasonable competitive business interest and to be reasonable as to its duration, geographical area, and the type of employment or line of business, with its scope sized to Employee's actual role and Employer's actual market. If Employer has identified specific competitors in Cover Terms under Specified Competitors, the parties intend this covenant to be understood and, if necessary, enforced as limited to those named competitors, because a restraint bound to named competitors is strong evidence that it targets an unfair advantage rather than ordinary competition. Passive Public Holdings are permitted.
Drafting Note The reasonable-competitive-business-interest requirement
A Michigan non-compete is measured against MCL 445.774a, so a covenant that does no more than suppress ordinary competition fails even though the statute permits non-competes: it protects a reasonable competitive business interest only where it guards against the employee gaining an unfair advantage rather than shielding the employer from lawful rivalry . A covenant whose recited purpose is ordinary competition, or one bolted onto a role that touches no confidential information, customer relationship, or trade secret, has no interest to defend and is exposed on that ground before duration or geography is ever reached.
Drafting Note The general-knowledge-and-skill boundary
A Michigan covenant reaches only as far as the confidential information it reasonably protects and no further, so a restraint that sweeps in the general knowledge, skill, and experience the employee acquired on the job is enforceable only to the extent it guards real confidential information . A confidentiality definition that carves out general skill, and a covenant tied to identified protectable interests rather than to the employee's expertise, keep the restraint on the enforceable side of that line; a covenant that would bar the employee from using ordinary professional ability is unenforceable to that extent.
Drafting Note Scope and duration
Duration, geography, and covered activity are measured against the specific interest the covenant protects, so a long default term copied from another form is tested against a market it was never sized to. An unlimited or open-ended client restriction is vulnerable as unreasonable, and a narrower, interest-matched scope is the one a court is more likely to leave standing .
Drafting Note The rule-of-reason boundary for business-to-business covenants
An employee restrictive covenant and a covenant ancillary to the sale of a business or between businesses run on different tracks in Michigan: a genuine commercial covenant is judged under the antitrust rule of reason, not the MCL 445.774a duration-geography-and-line-of-business test . A covenant that mislabels a business-to-business restraint as an employee covenant, or the reverse, is analyzed under the wrong standard, and a restraint sized to satisfy one framework can fail the other; an employee agreement kept clear of transaction-ancillary restraints leaves each covenant measured against the standard it was drafted for.
11. Non-Investment
During the Restricted Period, Employee must not acquire or hold any active ownership interest in, serve as a director, officer, manager, or advisor to, or have material economic participation in any Competitive Business. This restriction primarily targets active or material ownership in private competitors. Because this covenant restrains active roles at and material participation in a Competitive Business, it functions as a covenant not to compete and is drawn no broader than necessary to protect Employer's Protected Interests. Passive Public Holdings are permitted.
12. Non-Disparagement
During the Restricted Period specified in Cover Terms for Non-Disparagement, Employee must not make statements that are intended to or reasonably likely to disparage Employer, its officers, directors, employees, products, or services. This section does not restrict Employee from making truthful statements in legal proceedings, providing truthful testimony, making disclosures to government agencies, or exercising rights protected by law, including rights protected under Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act.
13. Physician and Health Care Practitioner Covenants
If Employee is a physician or other licensed health care practitioner, any covenant in this agreement restraining Employee from practicing is intended to use a reasonable radius and term sized to the interest protected and to apply only to the extent it is reasonable as to its duration, geographical area, and line of business.
Drafting Note The physician-covenant proof hurdle
Michigan applies no categorical physician rule: a physician covenant runs through the ordinary MCL 445.774a reasonable-competitive-business-interest test and can satisfy it . The distinctive Michigan problem is proof rather than validity — the physician-patient privilege can block discovery of nonparty patient information, so a covenant that reads well can still be hard to enforce where the employer's diversion case depends on patient records it cannot reach . A radius and term sized to the interest protected, and an enforcement theory resting on non-privileged evidence of diversion, are what carry a physician restraint in practice rather than only on paper.
14. No Conflicting Obligations
Employee represents that performing duties for Employer and complying with this agreement does not conflict with any prior agreement, court order, or legal obligation binding on Employee. Employee must promptly disclose to Employer any potential conflict that arises during employment.
15. Notice to Future Employers and Other Third Parties
Employer may disclose the existence and terms of this agreement to any prospective employer or business associate of Employee if Employer has a reasonable belief that Employee may breach this agreement. Employee consents to this disclosure.
16. Tolling During Breach
If Employee breaches any restrictive covenant in this agreement, the Restricted Period for that covenant is extended by one day for each day of the breach, so that the full duration of the restriction runs from the date the breach ends. Any such extension is itself a restraint, is limited to what remains reasonable, and is not intended to be open-ended or indefinite.
Drafting Note Tolling as a separate reasonable restraint
Whether a Michigan court will extend a covenant past its stated end date for a period of breach is unsettled, and the statutory text cuts against assuming it will: MCL 445.774a authorizes a court to limit an unreasonable covenant, not to expand one, and any extension is itself a restraint that must clear the same reasonableness test . An extension-on-breach clause written as an open-ended toll that lengthens as litigation drags on invites the very unreasonableness the statute targets, while one bounded to the duration of the breach and tied to a legitimate interest stays inside the framework a court would apply as a question of law when the facts are undisputed.
17. Remedies
Employee acknowledges that a breach of this agreement may cause Employer irreparable harm for which money damages would be inadequate. Employer may seek injunctive or other equitable relief in addition to any other remedies available at law, including relief for actual or threatened misappropriation of a trade secret under the Michigan Uniform Trade Secrets Act.
18. Enforceability and Severability
If any provision of this agreement is found to be unenforceable, the remaining provisions remain in full force and effect. Each restrictive covenant in this agreement is intended to be independently enforceable, so that a court's refusal to enforce one covenant, or a court's decision to enforce a covenant only to a reasonable extent, does not affect the others.
19. Reformation
To the extent a covenant in this agreement is found to be unreasonable in any respect, MCL § 445.774a(1) empowers a court to limit the agreement to render it reasonable in light of the circumstances in which it was made and to specifically enforce the agreement as limited, and Employer requests such reformation if any restraint in this agreement is found to be overbroad. Each restrictive covenant in this agreement is nonetheless drawn as a reasonable, severable restraint with its scope, geography, and duration sized to the Protected Interests from the outset, and is intended to be enforceable as written rather than in reliance on judicial narrowing.
Drafting Note Judicial narrowing
MCL 445.774a lets a court limit an overbroad covenant, but the power is discretionary — the statute says a court may narrow a covenant, not that it must, and a court may decline to save one it views as punitive . A covenant drawn to the minimum scope, geography, and duration the protectable interest requires does not depend on that discretion, while one that reaches wide on the assumption a judge will trim it is exposed if the judge declines. That same discretion shapes what an employer can safely tell third parties about the covenant: a notice to a prospective employer built on a restraint a court later narrows or refuses to enforce can expose the employer to a tortious-interference claim, so a disclosure keyed to the covenant as it would actually be enforced carries less risk than one keyed to its full drafted breadth .
20. Survival and Expiration of Each Covenant
Each restrictive covenant in this agreement survives the termination of Employee's employment for the Restricted Period specified in Cover Terms. Obligations under the Confidential Information and Trade Secret Protection section survive indefinitely to the extent they relate to trade secrets. All other provisions survive to the extent necessary to enforce rights that arose during employment.
21. Assignment and Successors
Employee may not assign this agreement or any rights or obligations under it. Employer may assign this agreement to any affiliate, successor, or acquirer of all or substantially all of Employer's business or assets. This agreement is binding on and inures to the benefit of the parties and their respective heirs, successors, and permitted assigns. The parties acknowledge that whoever enforces these covenants must still tie each restraint to a reasonable competitive business interest that the assignee or successor actually holds.
22. Governing Law, Venue, and Dispute Process
This agreement is governed by the law listed in Cover Terms. Where Michigan law governs, the enforceability of each restrictive covenant is determined under its reasonableness framework, and there is no fixed numeric safe harbor, so each covenant is drafted to survive the reasonableness analysis rather than to escape it. The parties agree to a Michigan forum for disputes arising out of or relating to this agreement. Disputes will be resolved in the courts of the Governing Law state, subject to non-waivable rights under applicable law. The parties intend that the governing-law and venue choices match where Employee actually lives and works and be drafted as a coherent pair.
23. Entire Agreement, Amendment, Waiver, and Electronic Signatures
This agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties regarding its subject matter and supersedes all prior agreements, understandings, and negotiations on this subject. The parties intend that this merger clause make clear exactly which signed document carries the restrictive covenants and what was exchanged for them. This agreement may be amended only in writing signed by both parties. A party's failure to enforce any provision does not waive that party's right to enforce it later. This agreement may be executed in counterparts, including by electronic signature, each of which is an original.
Signatures
By signing this agreement, each party acknowledges and agrees to the restrictive covenant obligations above. Employee confirms having read and understood each provision, including the Cover Terms.
Employer
Employer: [Legal name of the employer]
Signature:
Signatory Name: [Full name of the authorized signatory signing for the employer]
Title: [Title of the authorized signatory signing for the employer]
Date:
Employee
Signature:
Print Name: [Full legal name of the employee]
Date: