On this pageCover Terms
Tailor this agreementKey terms are editable before you download
Key terms

Pre-filled with this template’s default. Edit a term and your download uses your value.

Employee Restrictive Covenant Agreement

Cover Terms

The terms below are incorporated into and form part of this agreement.

Employer[Legal name of the employer]
Employee[Full legal name of the employee]
Employee Title / Position
Effective Date[Effective date of this agreement]
Governing LawUtah
Confidentiality
Trade Secrets DurationPerpetual
Other Confidential Information Duration24 months
Employee Non-Solicitation
Duration24 months
Market benchmark 24 months · modal of 67 filed agreements

Reference only — not part of this agreement.

A nonsolicitation agreement is expressly excluded from the Noncompetition Agreement Act's non-compete definition and one-year cap, so no statute fixes its length; it answers to common-law reasonableness. 24 months matches the modal employee non-solicit term observed in benchmarked, publicly-filed employee agreements; 12 months is the common lighter alternative, sized to the actual protectable interest.

View more details in benchmark survey (as of July 3, 2026) →
Covered Employee Period12 months
Customer Non-Solicitation
Duration12 months
Market benchmark 12 months · modal of 67 filed agreements

Reference only — not part of this agreement.

A nonsolicitation agreement sits outside the Noncompetition Agreement Act's non-compete definition and one-year cap; its length is governed by common-law reasonableness rather than a statutory figure. 12 months is the lighter side of the near-even 12/24-month split observed in benchmarked, publicly-filed employee agreements and a common, defensible term.

View more details in benchmark survey (as of July 3, 2026) →
Covered Customer Period12 months
Non-Competition
Duration12 months
State-law basis 12 months

Reference only — not part of this agreement.

The Noncompetition Agreement Act caps a post-employment non-compete at one year from the day employment ends and makes an over-length covenant void, not merely voidable. 12 months sits at the statutory ceiling; a shorter term reduces the reasonableness challenge and the void risk. The tool must not default to a term that exceeds the one-year cap.

Restricted Territorythe geographic area in which Employer actually provides its products or services
State-law basis the geographic area in which Employer actually provides its products or services

Reference only — not part of this agreement.

Utah tests geographic scope against the area the business actually serves: a restraint no greater than the business's footprint is generally enforceable, while a territory drawn from ambition rather than the actual market is where reasonableness challenges start.

Competitive Business[Description of the business activities that constitute competition with the employer.]
Specified Competitors
Passive Public Holdings Thresholdfive percent
Market benchmark 5 % · modal of 48 filed agreements

Reference only — not part of this agreement.

No Utah statute fixes a passive-investment threshold; five percent of any class of publicly traded securities is the modal passive-investment carve-out threshold observed in benchmarked, publicly-filed employee agreements that include the carve-out (lower 1-3 percent thresholds are the common tighter alternatives), and the carve-out keeps the restraint from reaching index funds or a few public shares that no goodwill interest justifies.

View more details in benchmark survey (as of July 3, 2026) →
Non-Disparagement
Duration24 months

Standard Terms

1. Defined Terms

“Competitive Business” means the business activities described in Cover Terms under Competitive Business, limited to providing a product, process, or service that is similar to Employer's product, process, or service, consistent with Utah Code section 34-51-102(8)(a).

“Confidential Information” means non-public information relating to Employer's business, including trade secrets, customer lists, pricing, business processes, technical data, and strategic plans, but excluding information that becomes public through no fault of Employee and excluding Employee's general skill, knowledge, and experience.

“Covered Customers” means customers, vendors, referral sources, and business partners with whom Employee had material contact or for whom Employee had responsibility during the 12 months before termination of employment.

“Covered Employees” means employees with whom Employee worked or whom Employee managed during the 12 months before termination of employment.

“Passive Public Holdings” means ownership of securities of a publicly traded company representing less than five percent of any class of such company's securities, and interests in diversified mutual funds, index funds, and exchange-traded funds that may hold securities of a Competitive Business.

“Protected Interests” means Employer's legitimate business interests in its Confidential Information and trade secrets, its goodwill, and any extraordinary training Employer provided to Employee, which Utah common law recognizes as the interests a carefully drawn covenant may protect rather than ordinary competition.

“Restricted Period” means the duration specified in Cover Terms for each covenant, beginning on the day on which Employee is no longer employed by Employer for any reason. For the non-competition covenant, the Restricted Period may not exceed one year from that day, and any longer term is void under Utah Code section 34-51-201(1).

“Restricted Territory” means the geographic area described in Cover Terms under Restricted Territory.

“Solicit” means to directly or indirectly contact, approach, induce, or encourage any person or entity for the purpose of diverting business away from Employer, but does not include responding to general advertisements or unsolicited inquiries not initiated by Employee.

“Trade Secrets” has the meaning given in the Utah Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Utah Code section 13-24-2(4): information that derives independent economic value from not being generally known or readily ascertainable and that is the subject of efforts reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy.

2. Recitals and Legitimate Business Interests

Employer and Employee acknowledge that each restrictive covenant in this agreement is carefully drawn to protect one or more of Employer's Protected Interests and not to shield Employer from ordinary competition. To the extent any covenant is a non-compete, the parties intend it to be supported by consideration, negotiated in good faith, no broader than necessary to protect the goodwill of the business, and reasonable in its restrictions as to time and area.

Drafting Note The four-part reasonableness test

A Utah non-compete stands or falls on the four-part common-law reasonableness test, not on the one-year cap alone: the Post-Employment Restrictions Act supplements rather than replaces the common law, so a covenant that fits inside the cap is still unenforceable where it lacks consideration, was negotiated in bad faith, protects no goodwill, or reaches further in time or area than the business needs . A covenant confined to the employer's legitimate interests — goodwill, confidential information, or extraordinary training — survives where one that reaches an employee's ordinary skills or ordinary competition does not . Consideration is the loose prong, satisfied by an offer of employment or continued at-will employment, but the good-faith prong is live: a covenant extracted through a quick hire-and-fire used solely to bind a worker to a long restraint is exposed on that ground .

3. Timing, Consideration, and Right to Consult Counsel

This agreement is effective as of the Effective Date listed in Cover Terms. Employer and Employee agree that the offer of employment, including continued at-will employment, is sufficient consideration for the restrictive covenants, and that the terms of this agreement are not rendered unenforceable merely because they are harsh or the parties' obligations are unequal. Employer has given Employee a genuine opportunity to review this agreement and to consult with an attorney before signing, and confirms that it has not used a quick hire-and-fire to bind Employee to the covenants.

4. Confidential Information and Trade Secret Protection

Employee must treat all Confidential Information as strictly confidential. Employee must not use or disclose Confidential Information except as required to perform authorized job duties or with Employer's prior written consent. Employee's obligations regarding trade secrets continue in perpetuity, for as long as the information remains a trade secret. Employee's obligations regarding other Confidential Information continue for the period specified in Cover Terms.

Drafting Note Confidentiality scope

Confidentiality and trade-secret protections hold only where they are tied to actual secret information and reasonable secrecy efforts. A definition that sweeps in ordinary know-how does not qualify as a trade secret, and a confidentiality clause that functions as a work ban can be recharacterized as a non-compete and pulled back under the one-year cap .

5. Permitted Disclosures and Protected Conduct

Nothing in this agreement prohibits Employee from: (a) reporting possible violations of law to any government agency, including the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, or any other federal, state, or local agency; (b) making disclosures protected under whistleblower provisions of any law; (c) discussing wages, hours, or other terms and conditions of employment as protected by applicable law; (d) testifying truthfully in legal proceedings or making any disclosure required by law, court order, or a valid government request; or (e) filing a sealed complaint in court using Confidential Information without liability. Pursuant to the Defend Trade Secrets Act (18 U.S.C. section 1833(b)), Employee may not be held criminally or civilly liable for disclosing a trade secret in confidence to a government official or attorney solely for the purpose of reporting or investigating a suspected violation of law, or in a sealed court filing.

6. Return, Deletion, and Certification of Company Property

Upon termination of employment, Employee must promptly return to Employer all documents, devices, files, credentials, and other materials containing or relating to Confidential Information. Where permitted, Employee must permanently delete electronic copies of Confidential Information from personal devices and accounts. Employee must certify compliance with this section in writing upon Employer's request.

7. Non-Solicitation of Employees

During the Restricted Period, Employee must not Solicit, recruit, hire, or attempt to hire any Covered Employee. This restriction does not prohibit Employee from providing a professional reference upon request or from hiring a person who responds to a general advertisement not directed specifically at Employer's employees. This covenant is drawn no broader than necessary to protect Employer's Protected Interests.

8. Non-Solicitation of Customers, Vendors, Referral Sources, and Business Partners

During the Restricted Period, Employee must not Solicit the business of any Covered Customer. This covenant is limited to customers, vendors, referral sources, and business partners the Employee actually served during the stated lookback. This covenant does not restrict Employee from serving a Covered Customer who first approaches Employee without any solicitation by Employee.

9. Non-Competition

During the Restricted Period, Employee must not engage in, be employed by, consult for, or have an active ownership interest in any Competitive Business within the Restricted Territory. The Restricted Period for this covenant may not exceed one year from the day on which Employee is no longer employed by Employer. This covenant is drawn no broader than necessary to protect Employer's Protected Interests. Passive Public Holdings are permitted. This covenant does not apply to a healthcare worker as a healthcare non-compete agreement, and does not apply to a veterinarian unless the veterinarian holds at least a five percent ownership interest in the business (Utah Code section 34-51-201(1)(b), (3)).

10. Non-Disparagement

During the Restricted Period specified in Cover Terms for Non-Disparagement, Employee must not make statements that are intended to or reasonably likely to disparage Employer, its officers, directors, employees, products, or services. This section does not restrict Employee from making truthful statements in legal proceedings, providing truthful testimony, making disclosures to government agencies, or exercising rights protected by law.

11. Utah Statutory Limits and Exemptions

A post-employment non-compete under this agreement may not run more than one year from the day Employee's employment ends (Utah Code section 34-51-201(1)). The one-year cap does not apply to a covenant covered by the Act's exemptions: a reasonable severance agreement mutually and freely agreed upon in good faith at or after the time of termination, or a covenant arising out of the sale of a business where Employee receives value related to the sale; a severance agreement remains subject to common-law requirements (Utah Code section 34-51-202). Where Employer is a broadcasting company and Employee is an exempt broadcasting employee, any non-compete must sit within a written employment contract of reasonable duration and operates only where Employer terminates Employee for cause or Employee breaches the contract (Utah Code section 34-51-201(2)(a)). Employer and Employee may not enter into a healthcare non-compete agreement, may not enter into a veterinarian non-compete agreement unless the veterinarian holds at least a five percent ownership interest in the business, and may not enter into a healthcare nonsolicitation agreement that prevents a healthcare worker from informing a patient of the worker's current or future place of employment (Utah Code sections 34-51-201(1)(b), (3) and 34-51-203).

Drafting Note Restricted period

A covenant drafted for eighteen months or two years is not trimmed to one year by a Utah court; the statute makes the over-length covenant void, and an attempt to enforce it exposes the employer to the statute's fee-shifting penalty. A covenant sized to one year or less from the outset is the one that survives .

Drafting Note De facto non-competes

Label is not protection. A nonsolicitation or confidentiality clause drafted so broadly that it effectively blocks the employee from working in the field invites a court to treat it as a de facto non-compete, reimposing the one-year cap and the fee-shifting exposure .

Drafting Note The entered-into date and the 2026 bans

The Post-Employment Restrictions Act attaches by the date an agreement is entered, so a covenant re-executed through a renewal or amendment falls under the regime in force on the new date, including the healthcare-worker and veterinarian non-compete bans for agreements entered on or after May 6, 2026 . A non-compete with a healthcare worker that was valid when first signed becomes a prohibited healthcare non-compete once it is re-signed on or after that date, and a veterinarian non-compete is void from that date unless the veterinarian holds at least a 5% ownership interest .

12. No Conflicting Obligations

Employee represents that performing duties for Employer and complying with this agreement does not conflict with any prior agreement, court order, or legal obligation binding on Employee. Employee must promptly disclose to Employer any potential conflict that arises during employment.

13. Notice to Future Employers and Other Third Parties

Employer may disclose the existence and terms of this agreement to any prospective employer or business associate of Employee if Employer has a reasonable belief that Employee may breach this agreement, and only as to a covenant Employer reasonably believes is enforceable. Employee consents to this disclosure.

14. Tolling During Breach

If Employee breaches a nonsolicitation, confidentiality, or non-disparagement covenant in this agreement, the Restricted Period for that covenant is extended by one day for each day of the breach, so that the full duration of the restriction runs from the date the breach ends. This tolling does not apply to the non-competition covenant, which expires no later than one year after the day Employee's employment ends regardless of any breach, and no extension may push it past that date.

Drafting Note Tolling

A tolling or extension-on-breach clause that keeps a Utah non-compete alive past the one-year mark is a concrete void risk, not a safe equitable backstop. The statute fixes the period at one year from separation and voids longer covenants, so an extension that pushes the non-compete past that point exposes the whole covenant .

15. Remedies

Employee acknowledges that a breach of this agreement may cause Employer irreparable harm for which money damages would be inadequate. Employer may seek injunctive or other equitable relief in addition to any other remedies available at law, including an injunction against actual or threatened misappropriation of trade secrets under the Utah Uniform Trade Secrets Act (Utah Code section 13-24-3). Any fee-shifting between the parties is mutual and prevailing-party based.

Drafting Note Employer fee exposure on failed enforcement

Utah's fee-shifting runs one direction only: an employer that seeks arbitration or files suit to enforce a non-compete, healthcare non-compete, nondisclosure clause, or nonsolicitation agreement later found unenforceable is liable for the employee's arbitration costs, attorney fees and court costs, and actual damages, whether or not the agreement says anything about fees . A one-way, employer-favoring fee clause cannot contract around that exposure, and escalating from a notice letter to an enforcement action on a covenant that turns out to be invalid is what triggers it; a mutual, prevailing-party fee provision sits alongside the statutory baseline rather than purporting to displace it .

16. Enforceability, Severability, and Reformation

If any provision of this agreement is found to be unenforceable, the remaining provisions remain in full force and effect, and each restrictive covenant is intended to be independently enforceable. The parties do not rely on judicial reformation to cure an overbroad covenant. Each restrictive covenant in this agreement is drawn no broader than necessary and is intended to be enforceable as written rather than in reliance on judicial revision.

Drafting Note Reformation

A savings or reformation clause does not backstop an overbroad Utah non-compete. The statutory void rule for over-length covenants and the common-law preference for carefully drawn restraints both cut against judicial rewriting, so a covenant that depends on a court to narrow it is exposed rather than saved .

17. Survival and Expiration of Each Covenant

Each restrictive covenant in this agreement survives the termination of Employee's employment for the Restricted Period specified in Cover Terms, with each covenant's clock running independently. Obligations under the Confidential Information and Trade Secret Protection section survive indefinitely to the extent they relate to trade secrets. The non-competition covenant expires no later than one year after the day Employee's employment ends, consistent with Utah Code section 34-51-201(1). All other provisions survive to the extent necessary to enforce rights that arose during employment.

18. Assignment and Successors

Employee may not assign this agreement or any rights or obligations under it. Employer may assign this agreement to any affiliate, successor, or acquirer of all or substantially all of Employer's business or assets. An assignment moves each covenant as it stands, including the non-competition covenant's one-year cap measured from Employee's separation and its reasonableness limits. This agreement is binding on and inures to the benefit of the parties and their respective heirs, successors, and permitted assigns.

19. Governing Law, Venue, and Dispute Process

This agreement is governed by the law listed in Cover Terms, including the Utah Post-Employment Restrictions Act, Utah Code sections 34-51-101 through 34-51-301. Disputes will be resolved in the courts of the Governing Law state, subject to non-waivable rights under applicable law. For a Utah workforce, the Act's one-year cap, void consequence, and fee-shifting are not waived or displaced by a choice of another state's law.

20. Entire Agreement, Amendment, Waiver, and Electronic Signatures

This agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties regarding its subject matter and supersedes all prior agreements, understandings, and negotiations on this subject. This agreement may be amended only in writing signed by both parties. A party's failure to enforce any provision does not waive that party's right to enforce it later. This agreement may be executed in counterparts, including by electronic signature, each of which is an original.

Signatures

By signing this agreement, each party acknowledges and agrees to the restrictive covenant obligations above. Employee confirms having read and understood each provision, including the Cover Terms.

Employer

Employer: [Legal name of the employer]

Signature:

Signatory Name: [Full name of the authorized signatory signing for the employer]

Title: [Title of the authorized signatory signing for the employer]

Date:

Employee

Signature:

Print Name: [Full legal name of the employee]

Date:

Authored by OpenAgreements contributors. Utah-specific analysis informed by the quote-verified Utah practice note. Licensed under CC BY 4.0.