Employee Restrictive Covenant Agreement
Cover Terms
The terms below are incorporated into and form part of this agreement.
| Employer | [Legal name of the employer] |
| Employee | [Full legal name of the employee] |
| Employee Title / Position | |
| Effective Date | [Effective date of this agreement — the date the last party signs. It anchors the durations stated in Cover Terms.] |
| Governing Law | South Dakota |
| Confidentiality | |
| Trade Secrets Duration | Perpetual |
| Other Confidential Information Duration | 24 months |
| Employee Non-Solicitation | |
| Duration | 24 monthsMarket benchmark 24 months · modal of 67 filed agreementsReference only — not part of this agreement. 24 months matches the modal employee non-solicit term observed in benchmarked, publicly-filed employee agreements, and it stays within the two-year ceiling South Dakota fixes for its statutory covenants — though the employee non-solicit itself is unaddressed by staged South Dakota authority, so the statutory clock is context, not a pin. 12 months is the common lighter alternative.
|
| Covered Employee Period | 12 months |
| Customer Non-Solicitation | |
| Duration | 24 monthsState-law basis 24 monthsReference only — not part of this agreement. South Dakota caps the existing-customer non-solicit at two years from the date of termination of the agreement. 24 months sits at the statutory ceiling; counsel may shorten it. |
| Covered Customer Period | 12 months |
| Non-Competition | |
| Duration | 24 monthsState-law basis 24 monthsReference only — not part of this agreement. South Dakota caps the employee non-compete at two years from the date of termination of the agreement. 24 months sits at that ceiling; a term exceeding two years falls outside the exception and into the void baseline, and the exceptions are construed narrowly. |
| Restricted Territory | the specified county, first- or second-class municipality, or other specified area in which Employer carries on a like business |
| Competitive Business | [Description of the same business or profession as that of the employer that constitutes competition under SDCL 53-9-11.] |
| Specified Competitors | |
| Non-Investment | |
| Duration | 24 months |
| Passive Public Holdings Threshold | five percentMarket benchmark 5 % · modal of 48 filed agreementsReference only — not part of this agreement. Five percent of any class of publicly traded securities is the modal passive-investment carve-out threshold observed in benchmarked, publicly-filed employee agreements that include the carve-out (lower 1-3 percent thresholds are the common tighter alternatives); a clause that technically forbids holding ordinary public shares restrains more than any of the statutory exceptions describes.
|
| Non-Disparagement | |
| Duration | 24 months |
Standard Terms
1. Defined Terms
“Competitive Business” means the same business or profession as that of Employer, described in Cover Terms under Competitive Business.
“Confidential Information” means non-public information relating to Employer's business, including trade secrets, customer lists, pricing, business processes, technical data, and strategic plans, but excluding information that becomes public through no fault of Employee.
“Covered Customers” means existing customers of Employer with whom Employee had material contact or for whom Employee had responsibility during the 12 months before termination of the agreement. This definition does not reach prospective customers, former customers, or an entire market.
“Covered Employees” means employees with whom Employee worked or whom Employee managed during the 12 months before termination of the agreement.
“Passive Public Holdings” means ownership of securities of a publicly traded company representing less than five percent of any class of such company's securities, and interests in diversified mutual funds, index funds, and exchange-traded funds that may hold securities of a Competitive Business.
“Protected Interests” means Employer's legitimate interests in its Confidential Information and trade secrets, its relationships with its existing customers, and its goodwill. The parties acknowledge that, under SDCL chapter 53-9, whether a covenant is enforceable turns on statutory fit rather than on a free-floating reasonableness test.
“Restricted Period” means the duration specified in Cover Terms for each covenant, beginning on the date of termination of the agreement and, for the non-competition and customer non-solicitation covenants, not exceeding two years from that date as required by SDCL 53-9-11.
“Restricted Territory” means the specified county, first- or second-class municipality, or other specified area described in Cover Terms under Restricted Territory in which Employer continues to carry on a like business.
“Solicit” means to directly or indirectly contact, approach, induce, or encourage any person or entity for the purpose of diverting business away from Employer. Soliciting is affirmative outreach; it does not include accepting, servicing, or selling to a Covered Customer who initiates contact without solicitation by Employee, and it does not include responding to general advertisements or unsolicited inquiries not initiated by Employee.
“Trade Secrets” has the meaning given in the South Dakota Uniform Trade Secrets Act, SDCL 37-29-1.
2. Recitals and Statutory Basis
Employer and Employee acknowledge that each restrictive covenant in this agreement is drawn to fit within the employee exception in SDCL 53-9-11, applies only within the area, duration, and like-business limits stated in that covenant, is no broader than the exception permits, and protects Employer's Protected Interests.
3. Timing, Consideration, and Acknowledgements
Employee agrees to these covenants at the time of employment or during employment, and Employee acknowledges receiving adequate consideration for them, including employment or continued employment, compensation, and access to Employer's Confidential Information. Employee acknowledges having had the opportunity to consult an attorney before signing. This agreement is effective as of the Effective Date listed in Cover Terms, which is also the date from which the statutory two-year ceiling is measured.
4. Confidential Information and Trade Secret Protection
Employee must treat all Confidential Information as strictly confidential. Employee must not use or disclose Confidential Information except as required to perform authorized job duties or with Employer's prior written consent. Employee's obligations regarding trade secrets continue in perpetuity for as long as the information remains a trade secret. Employee's obligations regarding other Confidential Information continue for the period specified in Cover Terms, and are enforced only to the extent reasonably necessary to protect Employer's interest in Confidential Information.
Drafting Note Confidentiality scope
An NDA drafted as a disguised work ban does not gain South Dakota's protection for confidential information. A confidentiality covenant is strictly construed and enforced only to the extent reasonably necessary to protect the employer's interest in confidential information, so a clause that sweeps past that interest is exposed on the same ground a non-compete would be .
5. Permitted Disclosures and Protected Conduct
Nothing in this agreement prohibits Employee from: (a) reporting possible violations of law to any government agency, including the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, or any other federal, state, or local agency; (b) making disclosures protected under whistleblower provisions of any law; (c) discussing wages, hours, or other terms and conditions of employment as protected by Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 157; (d) testifying truthfully in legal proceedings; or (e) filing a sealed complaint in court using Confidential Information without liability. Pursuant to the Defend Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1833(b), Employee may not be held criminally or civilly liable for disclosing a trade secret in confidence to a government official or attorney solely for the purpose of reporting or investigating a suspected violation of law, or in a sealed court filing.
6. Return, Deletion, and Certification of Company Property
Upon termination of employment, Employee must promptly return to Employer all documents, devices, files, credentials, and other materials containing or relating to Confidential Information. Where permitted, Employee must permanently delete electronic copies of Confidential Information from personal devices and accounts. Employee must certify compliance with this section in writing upon Employer's request.
7. Non-Solicitation of Employees
During the Restricted Period specified in Cover Terms for Employee Non-Solicitation, Employee must not Solicit, recruit, hire, or attempt to hire any Covered Employee. This restriction does not prohibit Employee from providing a professional reference upon request or from hiring a person who responds to a general advertisement not directed specifically at Employer's employees.
8. Non-Solicitation of Existing Customers
During the Restricted Period specified in Cover Terms for Customer Non-Solicitation, Employee must not Solicit any Covered Customer within the Restricted Territory while Employer continues to carry on a like business therein. This covenant is limited to affirmative solicitation of Employer's existing customers, as SDCL 53-9-11 permits, and does not prohibit Employee from accepting, servicing, or selling to a customer who seeks out Employee without solicitation. The Restricted Period for this covenant does not exceed two years from the date of termination of the agreement.
Drafting Note Customer solicitation
A South Dakota customer non-solicit that reaches beyond affirmative solicitation — no-service, no-sale, or no-acceptance language — falls outside every statutory exception and into the section 53-9-8 void zone, because an agreement not to solicit is not an agreement not to sell and no exception permits barring acceptance of unsolicited business . A covenant confined to affirmative solicitation of existing customers within the specified area holds where a broader no-dealing clause does not.
9. Non-Competition
During the Restricted Period specified in Cover Terms for Non-Competition, Employee must not engage, directly or indirectly, in the same business or profession as that of Employer — that is, in any Competitive Business — within the Restricted Territory, while Employer continues to carry on a like business therein. This covenant relies on the employee exception in SDCL 53-9-11; its duration does not exceed two years from the date of termination of the agreement, its territory is confined to the specified county, first- or second-class municipality, or other specified area named in Cover Terms, and it operates only while Employer carries on a like business in that area. Passive Public Holdings are permitted.
10. Non-Investment
During the Restricted Period specified in Cover Terms for Non-Investment, Employee must not acquire or hold any active ownership interest in, serve as a director, officer, manager, or advisor to, or have material economic participation in any Competitive Business within the Restricted Territory. This restriction primarily targets active or material ownership in private competitors. Passive Public Holdings are permitted. Because a restraint on active roles at and material participation in a Competitive Business functions as a covenant not to compete, it is subject to the same SDCL 53-9-11 limits as the non-compete in this agreement — the specified area, the like-business condition, and the two-year ceiling measured from the date of termination of the agreement.
11. Non-Disparagement
During the Restricted Period specified in Cover Terms for Non-Disparagement, Employee must not make statements that are intended to or reasonably likely to disparage Employer, its officers, directors, employees, products, or services. This section does not restrict Employee from making truthful statements in legal proceedings, providing truthful testimony, making disclosures to government agencies, or exercising rights protected by law, including protected concerted activity under Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act.
12. Healthcare Practitioner Carve-Out
If Employee is a practitioner as defined in SDCL 53-9-11.1 — a broad class that includes physicians, physician assistants, paramedics and emergency medical technicians, respiratory care practitioners, chiropractors, and other licensed clinical roles — then under SDCL 53-9-11.2 any provision of this agreement that would restrict Employee from practicing or otherwise providing professional services in accordance with the applicable scope of practice, after the conclusion of the employment or professional relationship, is voidable at Employee's election and Employer will not seek to enforce it as a practice restriction. This section does not apply to a provision effective upon the sale of a practice or an interest in a practice, or to a restriction on soliciting current patients or clients that complies with the geographic and temporal limitations referenced in SDCL 53-9-11.
Drafting Note Healthcare practitioner restrictions
For a contract entered into on or after July 1, 2023, section 53-9-11.2 makes a provision restricting a covered practitioner from practicing or providing professional services after the relationship ends voidable — not void — at the practitioner's election, and the statutory class reaches far beyond physicians. Because the provision stands unless the practitioner avoids it, and because the section treats a practice restriction and a compliant current-patient or current-client solicitation restriction differently, a practice restriction bundled with an otherwise-compliant patient non-solicit leaves the compliant piece exposed to the voidable one .
13. No Restraint Through a Third-Party Agreement
Employer's rights under this agreement rest on Employee's own covenants. Employer does not rely on, and this agreement does not incorporate, any no-hire, no-solicit, or no-recruit clause in any agreement between Employer and a customer, vendor, or other third party as a means of restraining Employee.
Drafting Note Third-party no-hire
A no-poach or no-hire clause in a customer, vendor, or services agreement does not restrain a South Dakota worker who has signed no valid SDCL 53-9-11 covenant: an employer may not bind its own employee through an agreement with a third party, and a court treats the no-recruit clause as a variation on the covenant not to compete governed by section 53-9-11 and the section 53-9-8 baseline . A third-party clause can supplement a valid employee covenant, but it cannot substitute for one.
14. No Conflicting Obligations
Employee represents that performing duties for Employer and complying with this agreement does not conflict with any prior agreement, court order, or legal obligation binding on Employee. Employee must promptly disclose to Employer any potential conflict that arises during employment.
15. Notice to Future Employers and Other Third Parties
Employer may disclose the existence and terms of this agreement to any prospective employer or business associate of Employee if Employer has a reasonable belief that Employee may breach a covenant in this agreement that fits an SDCL chapter 53-9 exception. Employee consents to this disclosure.
16. Tolling During Breach
If Employee breaches any restrictive covenant in this agreement, Employer may seek to extend the Restricted Period for that covenant by one day for each day of the breach. No extension under this section carries a covenant beyond the two-year ceiling that SDCL 53-9-11 measures from the date of termination of the agreement.
17. Remedies
Employee acknowledges that a breach of this agreement may cause Employer irreparable harm for which money damages would be inadequate, and Employer may seek injunctive or other equitable relief in addition to any other remedies available at law. The South Dakota Uniform Trade Secrets Act, SDCL 37-29-1 et seq., supplies independent remedies for misappropriation of trade secrets that operate whether or not any covenant in this agreement survives.
18. Statutory Fit and Severability
Each restrictive covenant in this agreement is drawn to fit within an exception to SDCL 53-9-8 and is intended to be enforceable as written rather than in reliance on judicial revision. If any restraint is found to exceed the applicable exception, it is enforced only to the extent the exception permits and is otherwise void to that extent under SDCL 53-9-8. Because the agreement is divisible, the confidentiality and trade-secret obligations and any other separable provisions remain in full force even if a restrictive covenant is found unenforceable.
Drafting Note Statutory fit
A covenant that restrains work but fits no exception in SDCL chapter 53-9 is void to that extent under the baseline statute, which starts from voidness rather than a free-floating reasonableness test . The exceptions are construed narrowly to promote the proscription against general restraints on trade, so a covenant drawn past the exception it invokes is not read charitably back into bounds, and a restraint the chapter voids gives the employer no enforceable covenant to assert .
Drafting Note Partial enforcement
South Dakota recognizes partial enforcement, but a court modifies an overbroad covenant only to conform it to the statutory limits and refuses to read in exceptions the Legislature did not adopt, so a covenant drafted past the chapter 53-9 line is narrowed to the exception at best and void beyond it at worst — never rewritten into the broader restraint the drafter wanted . What survives a failed non-compete is the divisible remainder: section 53-9-8 voids a contract only to the extent it restrains trade, so separable confidentiality and nondisclosure promises can stand even when a covenant falls .
19. Survival and Expiration of Each Covenant
Each restrictive covenant in this agreement expressly survives the termination or expiration of Employee's employment and of this agreement, including the expiration of any fixed term, for the Restricted Period specified in Cover Terms for that covenant. The parties intend this survival to apply covenant by covenant, so that a covenant remains in effect for its Restricted Period even if this agreement otherwise ends by its own terms. Obligations under the Confidential Information and Trade Secret Protection section survive to the extent they relate to trade secrets for as long as the information remains a trade secret. All other provisions survive to the extent necessary to enforce rights that arose during employment.
Drafting Note Covenant survival in a fixed-term agreement
Restrictive covenants in a fixed-term South Dakota agreement that lacks express survival language end when the agreement ends: where the parties performed a fixed-term agreement to its stated end, the Eighth Circuit held the restrictive covenants terminated with it because nothing said they survived . The trap compounds with the statutory clock, which measures the two-year ceiling from the date of termination of the agreement, so the agreement term, the termination language, the per-covenant durations, and the survival clause have to align — a covenant impeccable under section 53-9-11 still fails if the contract ends before the restriction is triggered .
20. Assignment and Successors
Employee may not assign this agreement or any rights or obligations under it. Employer may assign this agreement to any affiliate, successor, or acquirer of all or substantially all of Employer's business or assets. Any successor that holds a restrictive covenant takes it subject to the same SDCL 53-9-11 limits, including the like-business condition; a successor that ceases to carry on a like business in the Restricted Territory loses the condition on which the covenant depends. This agreement is binding on and inures to the benefit of the parties and their respective heirs, successors, and permitted assigns.
21. Governing Law, Venue, and Dispute Process
This agreement is governed by the law listed in Cover Terms. Disputes will be resolved in the courts of the Governing Law state, subject to non-waivable rights under applicable law.
Drafting Note Out-of-state choice of law
An out-of-state choice-of-law clause does not save a covenant that chapter 53-9 would condemn. South Dakota courts honor a contractual choice of law only until it contravenes South Dakota public policy, and section 53-9-8 is a legislative public-policy expression rather than a private default, so a South Dakota worker, a South Dakota restricted territory, or a South Dakota customer base is measured under chapter 53-9 whatever law the agreement names . A covenant built to satisfy another state's looser rule but not the South Dakota exception stays exposed on the covenant that matters.
22. Entire Agreement, Amendment, Waiver, and Electronic Signatures
This agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties regarding its subject matter and supersedes all prior agreements, understandings, and negotiations on this subject. This agreement may be amended only in writing signed by both parties, and any amendment must preserve the date on which the agreement was entered into and the date from which the statutory two-year ceiling runs. A party's failure to enforce any provision does not waive that party's right to enforce it later. This agreement may be executed in counterparts, including by electronic signature, each of which is an original.
Signatures
By signing this agreement, each party acknowledges and agrees to the restrictive covenant obligations above. Employee confirms having read and understood each provision, including the Cover Terms.
Employer
Employer: [Legal name of the employer]
Signature:
Signatory Name: [Full name of the authorized signatory signing for the employer]
Title: [Title of the authorized signatory signing for the employer]
Date:
Employee
Signature:
Print Name: [Full legal name of the employee]
Date: