On this pageCover Terms
Tailor this agreementKey terms are editable before you download
Key terms

Pre-filled with this template’s default. Edit a term and your download uses your value.

Employee Restrictive Covenant Agreement

Cover Terms

The terms below are incorporated into and form part of this agreement.

Employer[Legal name of the employer]
Employee[Full legal name of the employee]
Employee Title / Position
Effective Date[Effective date of this agreement — the date the last party signs. It anchors the durations stated in Cover Terms.]
Governing LawGeorgia
Confidentiality
Trade Secrets DurationFor as long as the information remains a trade secret
State-law basis For as long as the information remains a trade secret

Reference only — not part of this agreement.

Georgia law places no fixed time limit on trade-secret protection for as long as the material remains a trade secret, so a fixed expiry would unnecessarily surrender the most durable protection.

Other Confidential Information DurationFor as long as the information remains confidential
State-law basis For as long as the information remains confidential

Reference only — not part of this agreement.

Georgia law authorizes an open-ended confidentiality obligation keyed to continued confidentiality; a stated finite term for ordinary business information remains an acceptable alternative.

Employee Non-Solicitation
Duration24 months
State-law basis 24 months

Reference only — not part of this agreement.

Employee non-recruitment covenants are analyzed under the Georgia restrictive-covenant framework, so 24 months tracks the two-year former-employee presumption window.

Customer Non-Solicitation
Duration24 months
State-law basis 24 months

Reference only — not part of this agreement.

24 months sits within the two-year presumptively reasonable window measured from termination of the business relationship.

Non-Competition
Duration24 months
State-law basis 24 months

Reference only — not part of this agreement.

A former-employee restraint of two years or less is presumed reasonable in time and a restraint over two years is presumed unreasonable, so the tool should not default beyond 24 months.

Restricted Territorythe geographic areas in which Employer conducts business
State-law basis the geographic areas in which Employer conducts business

Reference only — not part of this agreement.

An express territory tracking where the employer does business earns the presumption of geographic reasonableness when the total distance is reasonable or the agreement names particular competitors; leaving it blank may be permitted but forgoes that presumption.

Competitive Business[Description of the business activities that constitute competition with the employer.]
Specified Competitors
No Business with Covered Customers
Duration24 months
Non-Investment
Duration24 months
Non-Disparagement
Duration24 months

Standard Terms

1. Defined Terms

“Competitive Business” means the business activities described in Cover Terms under Competitive Business.

“Confidential Information” means non-public information relating to Employer's business, including trade secrets, customer lists, pricing, business processes, technical data, and strategic plans, but excluding information that becomes public through no fault of Employee.

“Covered Customers” means customers and prospective customers with whom Employee had material contact during the 2 years before termination of employment, meaning customers Employee dealt with on Employer's behalf, whose dealings with Employer Employee coordinated or supervised, about whom Employee obtained confidential information in the ordinary course of business, or from whom Employee earned compensation, commissions, or earnings, consistent with O.C.G.A. § 13-8-51(10).

“Covered Employees” means employees with whom Employee worked or whom Employee managed during the 24 months before termination of employment.

“Passive Public Holdings” means ownership of securities of a publicly traded company representing less than five percent of any class of such company's securities, and interests in diversified mutual funds, index funds, and exchange-traded funds that may hold securities of a Competitive Business.

“Protected Interests” means the legitimate business interests that justify a restrictive covenant under the Georgia Restrictive Covenants Act (O.C.G.A. § 13-8-55), including Employer's Confidential Information, Employer's trade secrets, Employer's substantial relationships with specific prospective or existing customers, and Employer's customer goodwill.

“Restricted Period” means the duration specified in Cover Terms for each covenant, beginning on the date Employee's employment with Employer ends for any reason.

“Restricted Territory” means the geographic area described in Cover Terms under Restricted Territory, if any is stated.

“Solicit” means to directly or indirectly, or by assisting others, solicit or attempt to solicit business, including actively seeking prospective customers, but does not include responding to general advertisements or unsolicited inquiries not initiated by Employee.

“Trade Secrets” means information that derives independent economic value from not being generally known and is the subject of reasonable efforts to maintain its secrecy, as described in the Defend Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1839(3).

2. Recitals, Consideration, and Legitimate Business Interests

Employer and Employee acknowledge that this agreement is a contract between an employer and an employee, one of the relationships to which the Georgia Restrictive Covenants Act, O.C.G.A. § 13-8-50 et seq., applies (O.C.G.A. § 13-8-52(a)), and that each restrictive covenant in this agreement is supported by, and no greater than necessary to protect, one or more of Employer's Protected Interests, which the parties record here. As consideration for entering into this agreement, Employer provides Employee with access to Employer's Confidential Information, specialized training, and Employer's customer goodwill and relationships. For an existing employee, the parties intend the recited consideration to supply value beyond continued at-will employment. The restrictive covenants in this agreement contain limitations as to time, geographic area, and scope of prohibited activities that the parties intend to be reasonable and no greater than necessary to protect Employer's Protected Interests, as O.C.G.A. § 13-8-53(a) requires.

3. Timing and Employee Acknowledgements

Employee acknowledges that the restrictions in this agreement are reasonable and necessary to protect Employer's Protected Interests. Employee acknowledges having had the opportunity to consult with independent legal counsel before signing this agreement. This agreement is effective as of the Effective Date listed in Cover Terms.

4. Confidential Information and Trade Secret Protection

Employee must treat all Confidential Information as strictly confidential. Employee must not use or disclose Confidential Information except as required to perform authorized job duties or with Employer's prior written consent. Consistent with O.C.G.A. § 13-8-53(e), nothing in the Georgia Restrictive Covenants Act limits the period of time for which, or the geographic area within which, a party may agree to maintain information as confidential or as a trade secret, for so long as the information remains confidential or a trade secret. Employee's obligations regarding trade secrets therefore continue for the duration specified in Cover Terms as Trade Secrets Duration, and Employee's obligations regarding other Confidential Information continue for the duration specified in Cover Terms as Other Confidential Information Duration, in each case releasing information once it is no longer confidential or a trade secret. Trade secrets remain protected for as long as they qualify as trade secrets, consistent with the Defend Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1839(3), and O.C.G.A. § 13-8-53(e). This confidentiality obligation does not restrict Employee's use of the general knowledge, skill, and experience Employee acquired during employment and is not intended to operate as a covenant not to compete.

Drafting Note Confidentiality duration

Confidentiality and trade-secret covenants protect information interests even against employees outside the non-compete categories. O.C.G.A. § 13-8-53(e) lets these obligations run for as long as the information stays confidential, without the durational or category limits that apply to non-competes, so an information interest a non-compete cannot reach is still protectable through a confidentiality covenant .

5. Permitted Disclosures and Protected Conduct

Nothing in this agreement prohibits Employee from: (a) reporting possible violations of law to any government agency, including the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, or any other federal, state, or local agency; (b) making disclosures protected under whistleblower provisions of any law; (c) discussing wages, hours, or other terms and conditions of employment as protected by applicable law, including Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. § 157); (d) testifying truthfully in legal proceedings or making disclosures required by law, court order, or a government investigation; or (e) filing a sealed complaint in court using Confidential Information without liability. Pursuant to the Defend Trade Secrets Act (18 U.S.C. § 1833(b)), Employee may not be held criminally or civilly liable under any federal or state trade-secret law for disclosing a trade secret in confidence to a government official or attorney solely for the purpose of reporting or investigating a suspected violation of law, or in a sealed court filing.

6. Return, Deletion, and Certification of Company Property

Upon termination of employment, Employee must promptly return to Employer all documents, devices, files, credentials, and other materials containing or relating to Confidential Information. Where permitted, Employee must permanently delete electronic copies of Confidential Information from personal devices and accounts. Employee must certify compliance with this section in writing upon Employer's request.

7. Non-Solicitation of Employees

During the Restricted Period, Employee must not Solicit, recruit, hire, or attempt to hire any Covered Employee. This covenant is limited to Covered Employees for the stated Restricted Period so that it is no broader in time or scope than necessary. This restriction does not prohibit Employee from providing a professional reference upon request or from hiring a person who responds to a general advertisement not directed specifically at Employer's employees.

Drafting Note Employee non-recruitment covenants under the Act

A Georgia employee non-recruitment or no-hire covenant is analyzed under the Restrictive Covenants Act, not the common law: Belt Power v. Reed placed these covenants within the Act's ambit, and in Wimmer the Supreme Court reviewed a two-year non-recruitment provision under O.C.G.A. § 13-8-53(a) . That places the clause under the same reasonableness standard, the same two-year employee presumption, and the same discretionary, narrowing-only modification as every other covenant — and, after Wimmer, without any express-geographic-term requirement — so a no-poach clause reaching beyond the colleagues the departing worker actually worked with or supervised is measured for overbreadth like any other restraint.

8. Non-Solicitation of Customers

During the Restricted Period, Employee must not Solicit the business of any Covered Customer for purposes of providing products or services that are competitive with those provided by Employer's business. This covenant reaches only Covered Customers, meaning customers and prospective customers with whom Employee had material contact, and is drawn no broader than necessary to protect Employer's Protected Interests.

Drafting Note Material-contact customers

A Georgia customer non-solicitation covenant reaches only material-contact customers, not the employer's entire customer base. O.C.G.A. § 13-8-53(b) confines these covenants to customers the employee actually dealt with and to competitive products or services, so a clause sweeping in the whole customer list is measured against the Act's reasonableness standard and exposed as overbroad .

9. No Business with Covered Customers

During the Restricted Period, Employee must not accept, service, or do business with any Covered Customer, regardless of whether Employee or the Covered Customer first initiated contact. This restriction reaches conduct beyond soliciting or attempting to solicit, and reaches only Covered Customers with whom Employee had material contact. It is drawn no broader than necessary to protect Employer's Protected Interests.

10. Non-Competition

During the Restricted Period, Employee must not engage in, be employed by, consult for, or have an active ownership interest in any Competitive Business within the Restricted Territory. This covenant applies only because Employee performs a covered function under O.C.G.A. § 13-8-53(a) — Employee customarily and regularly solicits customers or prospective customers, makes sales or obtains orders or contracts, performs the enumerated managerial duties, or serves as a key employee or a professional — as recorded in Cover Terms and the recitals. Employee's covered function is: Employee is a key employee or a professional, or in the course of employment customarily and regularly solicits customers or prospective customers, makes sales, or performs the managerial duties described in O.C.G.A. § 13-8-53(a).. The covenant contains limitations as to time, geographic area, and scope of prohibited activities that the parties intend to be reasonable and impose no greater restraint than necessary to protect Employer's Protected Interests, as O.C.G.A. § 13-8-53(a) requires. Where the Restricted Territory tracks the areas in which Employer conducts business, or names particular competitors for a limited period, the parties intend it to fall within the geographic-reasonableness presumption of O.C.G.A. § 13-8-56(2). Passive Public Holdings are permitted.

Drafting Note No-business covenants under the covered-employee gate

A covenant barring an employee from accepting or doing business with a former customer — not merely soliciting one — reaches beyond the customer non-solicit that sits outside the employee-category gate, so a Georgia court may treat it as a restraint on competition in its own right and test it against the O.C.G.A. § 13-8-53(a) covered-employee categories rather than as a routine non-solicit . Against a worker who neither solicits, sells, manages, nor qualifies as a key employee or professional, a no-business restraint read as a competition restraint is as vulnerable as a non-compete, and the categories are policed — an hourly equipment operator did not qualify as a key employee .

Drafting Note Territory reasonableness

A Georgia covenant does not fail merely for lack of an express territory, and one that states a territory is not automatically safe. After Wimmer, geographic scope is judged for overall reasonableness under O.C.G.A. § 13-8-56, so an unreasonably broad express territory remains vulnerable, and a covenant with no stated territory stands or falls on whether its actual reach is reasonable .

11. Non-Investment

During the Restricted Period, Employee must not acquire or hold any active ownership interest in, serve as a director, officer, manager, or advisor to, or have material economic participation in any Competitive Business. This restriction primarily targets active or material ownership in private competitors. Passive Public Holdings are permitted.

12. Non-Disparagement

During the Restricted Period specified in Cover Terms for Non-Disparagement, Employee must not make statements that are intended to or reasonably likely to disparage Employer, its officers, directors, employees, products, or services. This section does not restrict Employee from making truthful statements in legal proceedings, providing truthful testimony, making disclosures to government agencies, or exercising rights protected by law, including Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act.

13. Physician and Health Care Practitioner Covenants

A physician or other health care practitioner is bound by the covenants in this agreement only to the extent Employee performs a covered function under O.C.G.A. § 13-8-53(a). This agreement creates no physician-specific covenant and imposes no restriction on a health care worker who does not independently fall within one of those covered categories.

14. No Conflicting Obligations

Employee represents that performing duties for Employer and complying with this agreement does not conflict with any prior agreement, court order, or legal obligation binding on Employee. Employee must promptly disclose to Employer any potential conflict that arises during employment.

15. Notice to Future Employers and Other Third Parties

Employer may disclose the existence and terms of this agreement to any prospective employer or business associate of Employee if Employer has a reasonable belief that Employee may breach this agreement. Employee consents to this disclosure. Employer will limit any such disclosure to factual statements tied to covenants that comply with the Act.

16. Tolling During Breach

The Restricted Period for each covenant runs from the date Employee's employment ends and expires on its stated end date. If Employee breaches a restrictive covenant, Employer's remedy is prompt enforcement within the Restricted Period, including the injunctive relief described below, rather than an extension of the period. This agreement does not rely on tolling to push any restriction past its stated end date.

Drafting Note Tolling past contractual expiration

A Georgia covenant that banks on time added after its stated end date is on uncertain ground. In Daneshgari v. Patriot Towing Services, the Court of Appeals reversed a trial court for extending an injunction past the contractual expiration of a non-compete — even against a party violating the injunction — because Georgia precedent rejects equitable extension of a covenant's period . Whether a self-executing contractual tolling clause fares any better is undecided, so the stated end date functions as the real one, and the protection that holds comes from prompt enforcement inside the term rather than from a clause purporting to stretch the restraint past its expiration.

17. Remedies

Employee acknowledges that a breach of this agreement may cause Employer irreparable harm for which money damages would be inadequate. Employer may seek temporary and permanent injunctive relief and any other appropriate and effective remedy available at law or equity, including relief available under applicable trade-secret law to prevent actual or threatened misappropriation of trade secrets, consistent with O.C.G.A. § 13-8-58(c). Injunctive relief runs only through the covenant's stated Restricted Period.

18. Enforceability and Severability

If any provision of this agreement is found to be unenforceable, the remaining provisions remain in full force and effect. Each restrictive covenant in this agreement is intended to be independently enforceable.

19. Reformation

A court may modify a restrictive covenant that does not comply with O.C.G.A. § 13-8-53(d) only so long as the modification does not render the covenant more restrictive than as originally drafted. Consistent with O.C.G.A. § 13-8-54, the parties request that a court construe the covenants to comport with the reasonable intent of the parties and grant only the relief reasonably necessary to protect Employer's Protected Interests. Each restrictive covenant in this agreement is sized to Employer's legitimate business interest at the outset and is intended to be enforceable as written rather than in reliance on judicial modification.

Drafting Note Discretionary modification

An overbroad Georgia covenant does not survive on the assumption a court will rewrite it into shape. Modification under O.C.G.A. § 13-8-53(d) is discretionary and can only narrow, never expand — and in Belt Power v. Reed the court declined to modify at all, leaving the covenants unenforceable as written, so a covenant sized to the legitimate interest at the outset is the one that holds .

20. Survival and Expiration of Each Covenant

Each restrictive covenant in this agreement survives the termination of Employee's employment for the Restricted Period specified in Cover Terms. Obligations under the Confidential Information and Trade Secret Protection section survive for as long as the information remains confidential or a trade secret, consistent with O.C.G.A. § 13-8-53(e). All other provisions survive to the extent necessary to enforce rights that arose during employment.

21. Assignment and Successors

Employee may not assign this agreement or any rights or obligations under it. Employer may assign this agreement to any affiliate, successor, or acquirer of all or substantially all of Employer's business or assets. This agreement is binding on and inures to the benefit of the parties and their respective heirs, successors, and permitted assigns.

22. Governing Law, Venue, and Dispute Process

This agreement is governed by the law listed in Cover Terms, including the Georgia Restrictive Covenants Act, O.C.G.A. § 13-8-50 et seq. Disputes will be resolved in the courts of the Governing Law state, subject to non-waivable rights under applicable law. For a Georgia-based Employee, the parties intend Georgia law to govern the enforceability of the restrictive covenants. The covenants in this agreement are drawn to be enforceable under the Act on their own terms rather than in reliance on any foreign choice-of-law selection.

Drafting Note Foreign choice-of-law and the Georgia touchstone rule

A choice-of-law clause selecting a more permissive state does not move a Georgia-based covenant out from under the GRCA. Under Motorsports of Conyers v. Burbach, Georgia law remains the touchstone for enforceability in Georgia courts even where the contract selects another state's law, and a covenant unreasonable under the Act cannot be rescued by applying foreign law instead . The sequence is fixed — the Act first, the chosen law only if the covenant survives — so a covenant drawn to satisfy the GRCA on its own terms is the one that holds, while a form leaning on a sister-state selection was never localized for Georgia.

23. Entire Agreement, Amendment, Waiver, and Electronic Signatures

This agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties regarding its subject matter and supersedes all prior agreements, understandings, and negotiations on this subject. This agreement may be amended only in writing signed by both parties. A party's failure to enforce any provision does not waive that party's right to enforce it later. This agreement may be executed in counterparts, including by electronic signature, each of which is an original.

Signatures

By signing this agreement, each party acknowledges and agrees to the restrictive covenant obligations above. Employee confirms having read and understood each provision, including the Cover Terms.

Employer

Employer: [Legal name of the employer]

Signature:

Signatory Name: [Full name of the authorized signatory signing for the employer]

Title: [Title of the authorized signatory signing for the employer]

Date:

Employee

Signature:

Print Name: [Full legal name of the employee]

Date:

Authored by OpenAgreements contributors. Georgia-specific analysis informed by the quote-verified Georgia practice note. Licensed under CC BY 4.0.