Employee Restrictive Covenant Agreement
Cover Terms
The terms below are incorporated into and form part of this agreement.
| Employer | [Legal name of the employer] |
| Employee | [Full legal name of the employee] |
| Employee Title / Position | |
| Effective Date | [Effective date of this agreement — the date the last party signs. It anchors the durations stated in Cover Terms.] |
| Advance Delivery Date | [Date the employer delivered the non-compete provision to the employee in writing. For a valid highly compensated employee non-compete the employer must provide it at least 14 days before the individual commences employment, or, for a current employee, at least 14 days before the employee must execute the agreement.] |
| Governing Law | District of Columbia |
| District of Columbia Statutory Gates | |
| Minimum Qualifying Annual Compensation | $162,164State-law basis $162,164Reference only — not part of this agreement. $162,164 is the 2026 minimum qualifying annual compensation published in the D.C. Department of Employment Services Public Notice on the Prohibition on Non-Compete Clauses (Jan. 1, 2026). The statute indexes this figure to inflation each year, so counsel should confirm the published figure for the year the covenant is proposed rather than relying on the $150,000 statutory base. |
| Medical Specialist Minimum Compensation | $270,274State-law basis $270,274Reference only — not part of this agreement. $270,274 is the 2026 medical specialist threshold published in the D.C. Department of Employment Services Public Notice on the Prohibition on Non-Compete Clauses (Jan. 1, 2026), tracking the $250,000 statutory base as adjusted for inflation. |
| Confidentiality | |
| Trade Secrets Duration | Perpetual |
| Other Confidential Information Duration | 24 months |
| Employee Non-Solicitation | |
| Duration | 24 monthsMarket benchmark 24 months · modal of 67 filed agreementsReference only — not part of this agreement. 24 months matches the modal employee non-solicit term observed in benchmarked, publicly-filed employee agreements; 12 months is the common lighter alternative. The District's ban does not speak to employee non-solicits, so the clause is judged under common-law reasonableness; a shorter term supports treating it as a limited restraint on active solicitation.
|
| Customer Non-Solicitation | |
| Duration | 12 monthsMarket benchmark 12 months · modal of 67 filed agreementsReference only — not part of this agreement. 12 months is the lighter side of the near-even 12/24-month split observed in benchmarked, publicly-filed employee agreements and is a common enforceable duration here. A District customer non-solicit sits outside the statutory ban but is still a restraint of trade judged for reasonableness under common law (Ellis), and a shorter term supports that characterization.
|
| Non-Competition | |
| Duration | 365 calendar daysState-law basis 365 calendar daysReference only — not part of this agreement. 365 calendar days is the statutory ceiling for a non-medical highly compensated employee measured from separation. A term stated in years risks silently overshooting the day count, so the default is expressed in calendar days; a medical specialist may run to 730 calendar days. |
| Restricted Territory | the geographic area in which the Employee performed work for Employer |
| Competitive Business | [Description of the services, roles, industry, or competing entities the employee is restricted from performing work in or on behalf of. Section 32-581.03(a)(1)(A) makes a stated functional scope a condition of a valid highly compensated employee non-compete.] |
| Specified Competitors | |
| Non-Disparagement | |
| Duration | 24 months |
Standard Terms
1. Defined Terms
“Competitive Business” means the services, roles, industry, or competing entities described in Cover Terms under Competitive Business that the Employee is restricted from performing work in or on behalf of.
“Confidential Information” means non-public information relating to Employer's business, including trade secrets, customer lists, pricing, business processes, technical data, and strategic plans, but excluding information that becomes public through no fault of Employee, information that is readily ascertainable to the public, information that arises from Employee's general training, knowledge, skill, or experience, and information Employee otherwise has a right to disclose as legally protected conduct.
“Covered Customers” means customers, vendors, referral sources, and business partners with whom Employee had material contact or for whom Employee had responsibility during the 12 months before termination of employment.
“Covered Employees” means employees with whom Employee worked or whom Employee managed during the 12 months before termination of employment. This defined contract term is distinct from the statutory term "covered employee" in D.C. Code § 32-581.01(6), which refers to a worker the non-compete ban protects.
“Highly Compensated Employee” means an employee, other than a broadcast employee, who is reasonably expected to earn from Employer in a consecutive 12-month period, or who earned from Employer in the preceding consecutive 12-month period, compensation at or above the Minimum Qualifying Annual Compensation listed in Cover Terms, as required by D.C. Code § 32-581.01(10). A broadcast employee — an on- or off-air creator for a broadcaster under § 32-581.01(2) — is excluded from this category and may not be bound by a non-compete at any compensation level.
“Medical Specialist” means a Highly Compensated Employee engaged primarily in the delivery of medical services who holds a license to practice medicine, is a physician, has completed a medical residency, and receives total compensation at or above the Medical Specialist Minimum Compensation listed in Cover Terms, as defined in D.C. Code § 32-581.01(12).
“Protected Interests” means Employer's legitimate interest in protecting its Trade Secrets and its confidential and proprietary information. The District's non-compete definition carves out restrictions protecting the employer's confidential and proprietary information (D.C. Code § 32-581.01(15)(B)(i)), and its Uniform Trade Secrets Act supplies an injunction against actual or threatened misappropriation (D.C. Code § 36-402), so those information interests are the interests this agreement is drawn to protect.
“Restricted Period” means the duration specified in Cover Terms for each covenant, beginning on the date Employee's employment with Employer ends for any reason. For any Non-Competition covenant, the Restricted Period is stated and measured in calendar days from separation.
“Restricted Territory” means the geographic area described in Cover Terms under Restricted Territory.
“Solicit” means to directly or indirectly initiate contact with, approach, induce, or encourage any person or entity for the purpose of diverting business away from Employer, but does not include responding to general advertisements or unsolicited inquiries not initiated by Employee.
“Trade Secrets” means information that qualifies as a trade secret under applicable District of Columbia and federal law, including information that derives independent economic value from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable through proper means by, another person who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use (see the District's Uniform Trade Secrets Act, D.C. Code § 36-401, and the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1839(3)).
Drafting Note Confidential information scope
A confidentiality clause stays within the statutory carve-out only where it reaches genuine confidential and proprietary information. The carve-out protects restrictions on disclosing or using employer information; a nondisclosure clause drafted so broadly that it effectively prevents the employee from working for a competitor is exposed to recharacterization as a prohibited non-compete provision .
2. Recitals and Protected-Interest Statement
Employer and Employee acknowledge that each restrictive covenant in this agreement is ancillary to a valid employment relationship. Employee will receive access to Employer's Trade Secrets and confidential and proprietary information in the course of employment, and each covenant in this agreement is included for the protection of Employer's Protected Interests and drawn no broader than reasonably necessary to protect them. The parties intend each covenant to be enforceable as written and drawn within the scope District of Columbia law permits at the outset, rather than in reliance on any judicial narrowing.
3. Regime and Worker Classification
Any Non-Competition covenant in this agreement applies to, and is enforceable against, Employee only if Employee is a Highly Compensated Employee, and never applies to a covered employee — a District-based worker below the Minimum Qualifying Annual Compensation who spends more than 50% of work time for Employer in the District, or whose District-based employment involves substantial District work and not more than half elsewhere (D.C. Code § 32-581.01(6)). Such a provision is void as a matter of law for a covered employee under D.C. Code § 32-581.02(a). Coverage keys to where Employee works, not to the Governing Law named in Cover Terms. The confidentiality, non-solicitation, and non-disparagement obligations below do not depend on that classification.
4. Timing, Consideration, and Advance Delivery
This agreement is effective as of the Effective Date listed in Cover Terms.
For any Non-Competition covenant in this agreement with a Highly Compensated Employee, Employer provided the non-compete provision to Employee in writing on the Advance Delivery Date listed in Cover Terms — at least 14 days before Employee commenced employment for Employer or, if Employer already employed Employee, at least 14 days before Employee had to execute this agreement, as required by D.C. Code § 32-581.03(a)(2). Nothing in this agreement restricts or delays any notice or written disclosure that applicable law requires Employer to provide in connection with a non-compete provision, including the statutory notice under D.C. Code § 32-581.03a(b) and any workplace-policy carve-out disclosure under D.C. Code § 32-581.03a(a); those are companion writings delivered outside this agreement.
5. Confidential Information and Trade Secret Protection
Employee must treat all Confidential Information as strictly confidential. Employee must not use or disclose Confidential Information except as required to perform authorized job duties or with Employer's prior written consent. Employee's obligations regarding Trade Secrets continue for the period specified in Cover Terms under Trade Secrets Duration, which is intended to last as long as the information remains a trade secret. Employee's obligations regarding other Confidential Information continue for the period specified in Cover Terms under Other Confidential Information Duration. This section is a restriction on disclosing, using, selling, or accessing Employer's confidential and proprietary information within the carve-out to the non-compete definition (D.C. Code § 32-581.01(15)(B)(i)); it does not bar Employee from performing work for another for pay or operating Employee's own business, and it does not restrict Employee from using information that arises from Employee's general training, knowledge, skill, or experience, information readily ascertainable to the public, or information Employee otherwise has a right to disclose as legally protected conduct.
6. Permitted Disclosures and Protected Conduct
Nothing in this agreement prohibits Employee from: (a) reporting possible violations of law to any government agency, including the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the District of Columbia Office of the Attorney General, or any other federal, state, or local agency; (b) making disclosures protected under whistleblower provisions of any law; (c) discussing wages, hours, or other terms and conditions of employment as protected by applicable law, including Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 157; (d) testifying truthfully in legal proceedings; (e) disclosing information that arises from Employee's general training, knowledge, skill, or experience, information readily ascertainable to the public, or information Employee otherwise has a right to disclose as legally protected conduct; or (f) filing a sealed complaint in court using Confidential Information without liability. Pursuant to the Defend Trade Secrets Act (18 U.S.C. § 1833(b)), Employee may not be held criminally or civilly liable for disclosing a trade secret in confidence to a government official or attorney solely for the purpose of reporting or investigating a suspected violation of law, or in a sealed court filing.
7. Return, Deletion, and Certification of Company Property
Upon termination of employment, Employee must promptly return to Employer all documents, devices, files, credentials, and other materials containing or relating to Confidential Information. Where permitted, Employee must permanently delete electronic copies of Confidential Information from personal devices and accounts. Employee must certify compliance with this section in writing upon Employer's request.
8. Non-Solicitation of Employees
During the Restricted Period, Employee must not Solicit, recruit, hire, or attempt to hire any Covered Employee. This restriction is limited to initiating contact with or actively soliciting Covered Employees; it does not prohibit Employee from providing a professional reference upon request or from hiring a person who responds to a general advertisement not directed specifically at Employer's employees. This covenant does not prohibit Employee from performing work for another for pay or operating Employee's own business, so it sits outside the non-compete definition in D.C. Code § 32-581.01(15); it is included solely for the protection of Employer's Protected Interests and drawn no broader than reasonably necessary to protect them. It is confined to Employee's own solicitation of Covered Employees and does not restrict the mobility of Employer's workforce generally.
9. Non-Solicitation of Customers, Vendors, Referral Sources, and Business Partners
During the Restricted Period, Employee must not Solicit the business of any Covered Customer. This covenant bars solicitation of a defined set of relationships; it does not prohibit Employee from performing work for another for pay or operating Employee's own business, so it sits outside the non-compete definition in D.C. Code § 32-581.01(15). It is included solely for the protection of Employer's Protected Interests and drawn no broader than reasonably necessary to protect them.
10. Non-Competition
During the Restricted Period, Employee must not perform work for another for pay in a Competitive Business, or operate Employee's own Competitive Business, within the Restricted Territory. This covenant applies to, and is enforceable against, Employee only if Employee is a Highly Compensated Employee at the time it is proposed; it does not apply to a covered employee, for whom such a provision is void as a matter of law under D.C. Code § 32-581.02(a). The functional scope of the restriction is limited to the services, roles, industry, or competing entities set out in Cover Terms under Competitive Business and any Specified Competitors, and to the geographical limitations set out under Restricted Territory. The term of the restriction does not exceed 365 calendar days from the date Employee separates from employment, or 730 calendar days if Employee is a Medical Specialist, and the stated Non-Competition Duration in Cover Terms must not exceed the applicable calendar-day cap. Employer provided this provision to Employee in writing at least 14 days in advance and gave the prescribed statutory notice, as recited in the Timing, Consideration, and Advance Delivery section. This covenant is drawn to satisfy each condition of D.C. Code § 32-581.03(a).
Drafting Note Highly compensated employee non-compete validity requirements
A high salary alone does not make a District non-compete enforceable. The agreement must spell out the functional scope and geographic limits, stay within the duration cap, and be delivered at least 14 days in advance — miss any element and the covenant is not valid and enforceable under § 32-581.03(a) .
11. Named-Competitor Narrowing
Where Employer has identified its competitors in Cover Terms under Specified Competitors, the functional scope of the Non-Competition covenant is limited to those named competing entities and businesses of the same character. Where no competitors are named, the functional scope is limited to the Competitive Business described in Cover Terms.
12. Non-Disparagement
During the Restricted Period specified in Cover Terms for Non-Disparagement, Employee must not make statements that are intended to or reasonably likely to disparage Employer, its officers, directors, employees, products, or services. This section does not restrict Employee from making truthful statements in legal proceedings, providing truthful testimony, making disclosures to government agencies, discussing wages, hours, or working conditions as protected by law, or otherwise exercising rights protected by law.
13. No Retaliation
Employer will not retaliate or threaten to retaliate against Employee for refusing to agree to, failing to comply with, or complaining about a non-compete provision the District bans (D.C. Code § 32-581.02(b)). Nothing in this agreement conditions Employee's employment, advancement, or benefits on signing or complying with a provision that D.C. Code § 32-581.02 voids, and any language that would do so is of no effect.
14. Sale-of-Business Confinement
A covenant not to compete claiming the sale-of-business exclusion is outside the scope of this employee restrictive covenant agreement. That exclusion reaches only a covenant contained within, or executed contemporaneously with, an agreement between the seller of a business and one or more buyers of that business in which the seller agrees not to compete with the buyer's business (D.C. Code § 32-581.01(15)(A)). A covenant papering Employee as an employee rather than as a selling owner does not fit that exclusion. No provision of this agreement acquires sale-of-business status through assignment or an acquisition of Employer.
Drafting Note The seller-covenant carve-out
The sale-of-business exclusion reaches only a covenant contained within, or executed contemporaneously with, an agreement in which the seller of a business agrees not to compete with the buyer . A covenant that papers a departing employee as an employee rather than as a selling owner falls outside the exclusion and back into the § 32-581.02 ban, and even a qualifying seller's covenant is enforceable only to the extent its terms are reasonable under the District's common-law rule of reason . A covenant does not acquire sale-of-business status by riding through an assignment or acquisition.
15. No Conflicting Obligations
Employee represents that performing duties for Employer and complying with this agreement does not conflict with any prior agreement, court order, or legal obligation binding on Employee. Employee must promptly disclose to Employer any potential conflict that arises during employment. The parties acknowledge that a covenant Employee signed elsewhere is not automatically dissolved by the District's ban and may be litigated by the prior employer in another forum, so any such obligation should be surfaced at signing.
16. Notice to Future Employers and Other Third Parties
Employer may disclose the existence and terms of this agreement to a prospective employer or business associate of Employee only where the obligation disclosed remains lawful and enforceable against Employee in the District — a confidentiality or trade-secret duty, or a Non-Competition covenant that satisfies every D.C. Code § 32-581.03(a) gate. Employer will not present or attempt to enforce a non-compete provision that D.C. Code § 32-581.02 voids. Employee consents to a disclosure permitted by this section.
17. Tolling During Breach
The Restricted Period for each covenant runs from the date Employee's employment ends and is not extended by any period of breach. Any Non-Competition covenant's total restraint stays within the applicable 365-calendar-day or 730-calendar-day cap measured from the date Employee separates from employment (D.C. Code § 32-581.03(a)(1)(C)).
Drafting Note The statutory duration caps and tolling
The District's non-compete statute sets no tolling rule, and its duration limits run as hard caps in calendar days measured from the date the employee separates — 365 days for a non-medical highly compensated employee and 730 for a medical specialist . No District decision has endorsed extending a covenant past that ceiling on breach, and the common law the statute preserves as cumulative has not endorsed extension either . A highly compensated employee's covenant written to run past the cap during a period of breach reaches past the statutory ceiling and is exposed on that ground.
18. Remedies
Employee acknowledges that a breach of the confidentiality, trade-secret, non-solicitation, or a valid Non-Competition covenant in this agreement may cause Employer irreparable harm for which money damages would be inadequate, and Employer may seek injunctive or other equitable relief in addition to any other remedies available at law. Employer's trade-secret remedy is independent of any covenant: actual or threatened misappropriation of a trade secret may be enjoined under the District's Uniform Trade Secrets Act (D.C. Code § 36-402). Employer will not seek to enforce a non-compete provision against a covered employee, for whom such a provision is void under D.C. Code § 32-581.02(a). Any fee-shifting between the parties is mutual and prevailing-party based.
19. Enforceability and Severability
If any provision of this agreement is found to be unenforceable, the remaining provisions remain in full force and effect. Each restrictive covenant in this agreement is intended to be independently enforceable and is drawn in separable tiers so that an unenforceable covenant does not affect the others.
20. No Reliance on Judicial Reformation
This agreement does not rely on any savings or reformation clause to cure overbreadth and does not ask a court to enforce any covenant to the maximum extent permitted. For a covered employee a non-compete provision is void as a matter of law under D.C. Code § 32-581.02(a), and for a Highly Compensated Employee a covenant that misses a D.C. Code § 32-581.03(a) element is not valid and enforceable; each restrictive covenant is instead drawn within the enforceable scope District of Columbia law permits at the outset. A plain severability clause preserving the remainder of the agreement is not a reformation clause.
Drafting Note Reliance on judicial reformation
An overbroad District covenant does not survive on the assumption that a court will rescue it. A court may narrow an unreasonable restraint under Steiner, but it may not broaden one beyond the contract's terms, and for a covered or highly compensated employee the statutory rules — not judicial reformation — control whether the covenant is valid at all .
21. Survival and Expiration of Each Covenant
Each restrictive covenant in this agreement survives the termination of Employee's employment for the Restricted Period specified in Cover Terms. Obligations under the Confidential Information and Trade Secret Protection section survive as long as the relevant information remains a trade secret. A Non-Competition covenant survives only as a calendar-day count from separation within the applicable statutory cap, and no covenant survives that D.C. Code § 32-581.02 voids. All other provisions survive to the extent necessary to enforce rights that arose during employment.
22. Assignment and Successors
Employee may not assign this agreement or any rights or obligations under it. Employer may assign this agreement to any affiliate, successor, or acquirer of all or substantially all of Employer's business or assets. Any assignee takes each covenant subject to D.C. Code §§ 32-581.01–.04b as of the enforcement date: a void non-compete provision arrives at the buyer just as void, and an employee-side covenant does not acquire sale-of-business status by riding through an acquisition.
23. Governing Law, Venue, and Dispute Process
This agreement is governed by the law listed in Cover Terms. Coverage under the District's non-compete ban keys to where Employee works, not to the law named here, so for a worker who spends more than 50% of work time for Employer in the District — or whose District-based role involves substantial District work — the District's ban applies whatever the Governing Law clause says (D.C. Code § 32-581.01(6)). For such a worker the parties select District of Columbia law and a District of Columbia forum for disputes over the enforceability of the covenants. Nothing in the District's chapter supersedes the terms of a valid collective bargaining agreement (D.C. Code § 32-581.04a); where one governs the relationship, its terms control. All other disputes will be resolved in the courts of the Governing Law jurisdiction, subject to non-waivable rights under applicable law.
24. Entire Agreement, Amendment, Waiver, and Electronic Signatures
This agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties regarding its subject matter and supersedes all prior agreements, understandings, and negotiations on this subject. This agreement may be amended only in writing signed by both parties. The parties acknowledge that entering into a new or amended agreement is a fresh entry into the District's non-compete regime as of its date and, for a Highly Compensated Employee non-compete, restarts the 14-day advance-delivery requirement of D.C. Code § 32-581.03(a)(2). A party's failure to enforce any provision does not waive that party's right to enforce it later. This agreement may be executed in counterparts, including by electronic signature, each of which is an original.
Signatures
By signing this agreement, each party acknowledges and agrees to the restrictive covenant obligations above. Employee confirms having read and understood each provision, including the Cover Terms.
Employer
Employer: [Legal name of the employer]
Signature:
Signatory Name: [Full name of the authorized signatory signing for the employer]
Title: [Title of the authorized signatory signing for the employer]
Date:
Employee
Signature:
Print Name: [Full legal name of the employee]
Date: