On this pageCover Terms
Tailor this agreementKey terms are editable before you download
Key terms

Pre-filled with this template’s default. Edit a term and your download uses your value.

Employee Restrictive Covenant Agreement

Cover Terms

The terms below are incorporated into and form part of this agreement.

Employer[Legal name of the employer]
Employee[Full legal name of the employee]
Employee Title / Position
Effective Date[Effective date of this agreement]
Governing LawWisconsin
State-law basis Wisconsin

Reference only — not part of this agreement.

Wisconsin work should be governed by Wisconsin law because Wisconsin case law can reject a foreign choice-of-law clause selected to obtain more covenant-friendly treatment when Wisconsin public policy controls employee restrictive covenants.

Confidentiality
Trade Secrets DurationPerpetual
Other Confidential Information Duration24 months
Employee Non-Solicitation
Duration24 months
Market benchmark 24 months · modal of 67 filed agreements

Reference only — not part of this agreement.

24 months matches the modal employee non-solicit term observed in benchmarked, publicly-filed employee agreements; 12 months is the common lighter alternative. Either term must still read as a reasonable, fixed time limit under Wisconsin's five-factor reasonableness test, and counsel should confirm the term against the protected interest and the worker's role.

View more details in benchmark survey (as of July 3, 2026) →
Covered Employee Lookback12 months
Customer Non-Solicitation
Duration12 months
Market benchmark 12 months · modal of 67 filed agreements

Reference only — not part of this agreement.

12 months is the lighter side of the near-even 12/24-month split observed in benchmarked, publicly-filed employee agreements. The duration must be a reasonable, definite time limit, and Wisconsin sets no statutory figure, so counsel should size the term to the protected customer relationships.

View more details in benchmark survey (as of July 3, 2026) →
Covered Customer Lookback12 months
Non-Competition
Duration12 months
Market benchmark 12 months · modal of 70 filed agreements

Reference only — not part of this agreement.

12 months matches the modal non-compete term observed in benchmarked, publicly-filed employee agreements. A reasonable time limit is part of Wisconsin's five-factor reasonableness test, and the period must read as a fixed and definite stretch of time. Wisconsin sets no statutory ceiling, so counsel must justify the term against the protectable interest because a court cannot shorten an overlong one.

View more details in benchmark survey (as of July 3, 2026) →
Restricted Territorythe geographic area in which Employee provided services
State-law basis the geographic area in which Employee provided services

Reference only — not part of this agreement.

A reasonable territorial limit is part of Wisconsin's five-factor reasonableness test. Tying the territory to where the employee actually operated gives the geography a defensible basis; an everywhere-the-company-does-business territory risks voiding the whole covenant because Wisconsin does not let a court rewrite an overbroad employee restraint to a narrower lawful territory.

Competitive Business[Description of the business activities that constitute competition with the employer.]
Specified Competitors
No Business with Covered Customers
Duration12 months
Non-Investment
Duration12 months
Passive Public Holdings Thresholdfive percent
Market benchmark 5 % · modal of 48 filed agreements

Reference only — not part of this agreement.

Five percent of any class of publicly traded securities is the modal passive-investment carve-out threshold observed in benchmarked, publicly-filed employee agreements that include the carve-out (lower 1-3 percent thresholds are the common tighter alternatives). A clause that forbids holding ordinary public shares restrains the worker far beyond any protectable interest and feeds the harsh-or-oppressive reasonableness factor.

View more details in benchmark survey (as of July 3, 2026) →
Non-Disparagement
Duration24 months

Standard Terms

1. Defined Terms

“Competitive Business” means the business activities described in Cover Terms under Competitive Business.

“Confidential Information” means Trade Secrets and other non-public information that is genuinely competitively sensitive to Employer's business — including customer and pricing information, business processes, technical data, and strategic plans — that Employer takes reasonable measures to keep confidential. Confidential Information does not include ordinary, non-secret business information, information generally known in the trade, or information that becomes public through no fault of Employee. The parties intend this definition to be scoped to protectable information so that this covenant is not construed as an unreasonable restraint of trade.

“Covered Customers” means customers, vendors, referral sources, and business partners with whom Employee had material contact or for whom Employee had responsibility during the 12 months before termination of employment.

“Covered Employees” means employees with whom Employee actually worked, whom Employee supervised, or about whom Employee gained material information during the 12 months before termination of employment. This term does not reach every employee of Employer.

“Passive Public Holdings” means ownership of securities of a publicly traded company representing less than five percent of any class of such company's securities, and interests in diversified mutual funds, index funds, and exchange-traded funds that may hold securities of a Competitive Business.

“Protected Interests” means the legitimate business interests that justify a restriction imposed on Employee's activity under Wis. Stat. § 103.465 — Employer's Trade Secrets and genuinely competitively sensitive Confidential Information, its relationships with the specific customers, referral sources, and business partners Employee served, and its stable working relationships with the Covered Employees.

“Restricted Period” means the duration specified in Cover Terms for each covenant, beginning on the date Employee's employment with Employer ends for any reason. The Restricted Period for each covenant is a fixed and definite period and is not extended by any period of alleged breach or the pendency of any dispute.

“Restricted Territory” means the geographic area described in Cover Terms under Restricted Territory.

“Solicit” means to directly or indirectly initiate contact with, approach, induce, or encourage any person or entity for the purpose of diverting business away from Employer, but does not include responding to general advertisements or unsolicited inquiries not initiated by Employee.

“Trade Secrets” has the meaning given in the Wisconsin Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Wis. Stat. § 134.90(1)(c).

2. Recitals and Protectable Interests

Employer and Employee acknowledge that each restrictive covenant in this agreement is drawn to protect one or more of Employer's Protected Interests and is intended to be reasonably necessary for the protection of the employer within the meaning of Wis. Stat. § 103.465. Each post-employment restraint is drawn to rest on a legitimate protectable interest of Employer, a reasonable time limit, and a reasonable territorial limit, and to be no harsher than that protection requires. Employer would not provide Employee with access to its Protected Interests absent the protections in this agreement. Each covenant in this agreement is a separate covenant supporting a distinct interest, intended to be independently read and enforced.

Drafting Note The five-factor reasonableness test

Every post-employment restraint in the agreement — non-compete, customer or employee non-solicit, no-business-with-customers, and non-investment alike — stands or falls on the same five prerequisites, because § 103.465 makes a covenant enforceable only if the restrictions imposed are reasonably necessary for the protection of the employer . A restraint must be necessary to a protectable interest, reasonable in time, reasonable in territory, no harsher than that protection requires, and not contrary to public policy; a failure on any single factor is fatal, and because § 103.465 voids an unreasonable restraint in full, a covenant that reaches even slightly too far is struck rather than narrowed .

3. Timing, Consideration, and Right to Consult Counsel

Employee has had an opportunity to consult with an attorney of Employee's choosing before entering into this agreement. Where Employee signs this agreement at or before the start of employment, the offer of employment and the access to Employer's Protected Interests it entails are the consideration for the restrictive covenants. Where Employee signs this agreement during employment, Employer's forbearance from exercising its right to terminate Employee's at-will employment is consideration for the restrictive covenants; the parties intend that forbearance to be genuine and not a pretext for a sign-then-fire sequence. Employee acknowledges receiving one or more of these benefits in exchange for the restrictive covenants in this agreement. This agreement is effective as of the Effective Date listed in Cover Terms.

4. Confidential Information and Trade Secret Protection

Employee must treat all Confidential Information as strictly confidential. Employee must not use or disclose Confidential Information except as required to perform authorized job duties or with Employer's prior written consent. Employee's obligations regarding Trade Secrets continue for the Trade Secrets Duration stated in Cover Terms, for as long as the information remains a Trade Secret. Employee's obligations regarding other Confidential Information continue for the Other Confidential Information Duration stated in Cover Terms. The parties intend this covenant to reach only Trade Secrets and genuinely competitively sensitive information, and not ordinary or non-secret business information.

Drafting Note Confidentiality scope

A confidentiality or non-disclosure clause that sweeps in ordinary, non-secret business information rather than actual trade secrets and competitively sensitive information is judged as a restraint of trade. Diamond Assets held an overbroad confidentiality covenant unenforceable under § 103.465 on a motion to dismiss, so a catch-all NDA falls the same way an overbroad non-compete does — regardless of the evidence the employer might later offer .

Drafting Note Trade-secret safeguards

A protection program resting on a non-compete alone is only as durable as the covenant, while trade-secret safeguards — access controls, confidentiality designations, and exit procedures — do not depend on § 103.465. Wis. Stat. § 134.90 protects qualifying secrets regardless of a covenant's survival, but only where the information meets the statutory definition and was kept reasonably secret, so a program that neglects those safeguards leaves the secrets exposed if the covenant is void .

5. Permitted Disclosures and Protected Conduct

Nothing in this agreement prohibits Employee from: (a) reporting possible violations of law to any government agency, including the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, or any other federal, state, or local agency; (b) making disclosures protected under whistleblower provisions of any law; (c) discussing wages, hours, or other terms and conditions of employment as protected by applicable law, including Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act; (d) testifying truthfully in legal proceedings or making disclosures required by law, subpoena, or court order; or (e) filing a sealed complaint in court using Confidential Information without liability. Pursuant to the Defend Trade Secrets Act (18 U.S.C. § 1833(b)), Employee may not be held criminally or civilly liable for disclosing a trade secret in confidence to a government official or attorney solely for the purpose of reporting or investigating a suspected violation of law, or in a sealed court filing.

6. Return, Deletion, and Certification of Company Property

Upon termination of employment, Employee must promptly return to Employer all documents, devices, files, credentials, and other materials containing or relating to Confidential Information. Where permitted, Employee must permanently delete electronic copies of Confidential Information from personal devices and accounts. Employee must certify compliance with this section in writing upon Employer's request. These procedures support Employer's efforts to maintain the secrecy of its Trade Secrets.

7. Non-Solicitation of Employees

During the Restricted Period, Employee must not Solicit, recruit, hire, or attempt to hire any Covered Employee. This covenant applies only to Covered Employees — colleagues with whom Employee actually worked, whom Employee supervised, or about whom Employee gained material information during the covered lookback period — and does not reach Employer's workforce generally. This restriction does not prohibit Employee from providing a professional reference upon request or from hiring a person who responds to a general advertisement not directed specifically at Employer's employees.

Drafting Note Employee non-solicitation

An employee non-solicitation clause reaching the whole workforce, rather than the colleagues the departing worker actually worked with or supervised, is exposed on its face. Manitowoc v. Lanning treats employee non-solicitation as a § 103.465 restraint and voided an all-employees clause as overbroad on its face — and because § 103.465 voids in full, the covenant disappears rather than shrinking to a lawful core, taking any fee award built on it along .

8. Non-Solicitation of Customers, Vendors, Referral Sources, and Business Partners

During the Restricted Period, Employee must not Solicit the business of any Covered Customer. This covenant is drawn to protect Employer's relationships with the specific customers, referral sources, and business partners Employee served or learned protected information about, and not Employer's customer base generally.

9. No Business with Covered Customers

During the Restricted Period, Employee must not accept, service, or do business with any Covered Customer, regardless of whether Employee or the Covered Customer first initiated contact. This restriction is broader than non-solicitation because it applies even if the Covered Customer approaches Employee, and it is therefore confined to the Covered Customers class and to a definite Restricted Period.

10. Non-Competition

During the Restricted Period, Employee must not engage in, be employed by, consult for, or have an active ownership interest in any Competitive Business within the Restricted Territory. This covenant is confined to a protectable interest of Employer and to a reasonable time, territory, and scope. Where Employer's competitors are identified in Cover Terms under Specified Competitors, this covenant is narrowed to those named competitors. Passive Public Holdings are permitted.

11. Non-Investment

During the Restricted Period, Employee must not acquire or hold any active ownership interest in, serve as a director, officer, manager, or advisor to, or have material economic participation in any Competitive Business. This restriction primarily targets active or material ownership in private competitors. Passive Public Holdings are permitted. Because this covenant restrains active roles at and material participation in a Competitive Business, it operates as a covenant not to compete and is drawn no broader than reasonably necessary to protect Employer's Protected Interests.

12. Non-Disparagement

During the Restricted Period specified in Cover Terms for Non-Disparagement, Employee must not make statements that are intended to or reasonably likely to disparage Employer, its officers, directors, employees, products, or services. This section does not restrict Employee from making truthful statements in legal proceedings, providing truthful testimony, making disclosures to government agencies, discussing wages, hours, or other terms and conditions of employment, or otherwise exercising rights protected by law.

13. No Restriction on a Lawyer's Right to Practice

Notwithstanding any other provision of this agreement, no restrictive covenant in this agreement restricts the right of a licensed lawyer to practice law after the termination of the relationship. If Employee is a lawyer admitted to practice, the restrictive covenants that would otherwise restrict Employee's right to practice law do not apply and are void and unenforceable as to that right under Wisconsin Supreme Court Rule 20:5.6. This exclusion is not cured by any level of compensation or any showing of reasonableness.

Drafting Note The lawyer-practice bar

A covenant that would restrict a licensed lawyer's right to practice after the relationship ends does not hold in Wisconsin. SCR 20:5.6 bars a lawyer from participating in offering or making an agreement that restricts the right to practice after termination — with exceptions only for retirement-benefit agreements and restrictions settling a client controversy — and reaches the offering firm as well as the signing lawyer; no level of compensation and no showing of reasonableness cures a violation, so a practice restraint against a lawyer is void whatever consideration supports it .

14. Covenants Arising from a Sale of Business

This agreement governs restrictive covenants given by Employee in Employee's capacity as an employee, which are evaluated under Wis. Stat. § 103.465. Any covenant not to compete or not to solicit that arises from a genuine sale of a business or equity transaction is given by the seller in the transaction or equity documents, supported by transaction consideration, and separable from any employment relationship, and is not governed by this agreement. Nothing in this agreement is intended to recharacterize a transaction-based covenant as an employee covenant.

Drafting Note Sale-of-business covenants

The legal framework follows the substance of the deal, not the caption on the document. A covenant given as part of a genuine business sale or equity transaction — one separable from the employment relationship and not imposed through the employer's hiring leverage — is judged under the common-law rule of reason, which allows partial enforcement, while an employee covenant is locked into § 103.465's all-or-nothing rule; a sale-related covenant routed through an employment agreement risks recharacterization as an employee covenant and the harsher rule that comes with it .

15. No Conflicting Obligations

Employee represents that performing duties for Employer and complying with this agreement does not conflict with any prior agreement, court order, or legal obligation binding on Employee. Employee must promptly disclose to Employer any potential conflict that arises during employment.

16. Notice to Future Employers and Other Third Parties

Employer may disclose the existence and terms of this agreement to any prospective employer or business associate of Employee if Employer has a reasonable belief that Employee may breach an enforceable covenant in this agreement. Employee consents to this disclosure. This notice right depends on a covenant that survives the reasonableness test.

17. No Extension of the Restricted Period During Breach

The Restricted Period for each covenant is a fixed and definite period. It is not extended, tolled, or lengthened by any period during which Employee is alleged to be in breach or violation of a covenant, or by the pendency of any dispute or litigation. This agreement includes no extension-during-breach or tolling provision, and none is to be implied.

Drafting Note Extension during breach

A clause extending a Wisconsin covenant for periods of the employee's breach makes the duration indefinite rather than fixed. H&R Block v. Swenson held that such an extension voids the entire clause under § 103.465, and because Wisconsin courts will not blue-pencil it back to a fixed term, the tolling language destroys the covenant it was meant to protect; a pending-litigation tolling clause, while untested, raises the same definiteness problem .

18. Remedies

Employee acknowledges that a breach of an enforceable covenant in this agreement may cause Employer irreparable harm for which money damages would be inadequate. Employer may seek injunctive or other equitable relief in addition to any other remedies available at law; any such relief is available only on a covenant that is enforceable under Wis. Stat. § 103.465.

19. Divisibility; No Reliance on Reformation

Each restrictive covenant in this agreement is a separate covenant supporting a distinct interest, is intended to be independently read and enforced, and is drawn to a lawful scope at the outset. Under Wis. Stat. § 103.465, a covenant imposing an unreasonable restraint is illegal, void, and unenforceable even as to any part of the covenant that would be a reasonable restraint, and a court will not narrow or blue-pencil an overbroad covenant. Accordingly, this agreement does not rely on any court-may-modify or savings clause to cure overbreadth, and no such clause has any effect. If any covenant is found unreasonable and void, the remaining covenants, which support different interests and can be independently read and enforced, remain in full force and effect.

Drafting Note Reformation

A reformation, savings, or court-may-modify clause does not backstop an aggressive Wisconsin covenant. Section 103.465 voids an unreasonable restraint even as to the part that would have been reasonable, and Diamond Assets held that a modification clause contrary to the statute has no effect, so a covenant that reaches too far falls in full rather than shrinking to a lawful core .

Drafting Note Divisible covenants

Each restraint drafted as a separate, independently enforceable covenant stands on its own if another falls. Under Star Direct, distinct covenants supporting different interests are divisible, so a covenant isolated from the others survives the voiding of the most aggressive restraint, while restraints interlocked in one sprawling clause can fall together .

20. Survival and Expiration of Each Covenant

Each restrictive covenant in this agreement survives the termination of Employee's employment for the Restricted Period specified in Cover Terms for that covenant, and each expires on its own definite schedule and is readable on its own. Obligations under the Confidential Information and Trade Secret Protection section survive to the extent, and for as long as, the information remains a Trade Secret. All other provisions survive to the extent necessary to enforce rights that arose during employment.

21. Assignment and Successors

Employee may not assign this agreement or any rights or obligations under it. Employer may assign this agreement to any affiliate, successor, or acquirer of all or substantially all of Employer's business or assets. Any assignee takes each covenant subject to the same limits, conditions, and enforceability as apply between Employer and Employee. This agreement is binding on and inures to the benefit of the parties and their respective heirs, successors, and permitted assigns.

22. Governing Law, Venue, and Dispute Process

This agreement is governed by the law of the Governing Law state listed in Cover Terms. For employment performed in Wisconsin, the parties select Wisconsin law, including Wis. Stat. § 103.465, and do not rely on any foreign choice-of-law clause to obtain more covenant-friendly treatment. Disputes will be resolved in the courts of the Governing Law state, subject to non-waivable rights under applicable law.

23. Entire Agreement, Amendment, Waiver, and Electronic Signatures

This agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties regarding its subject matter and supersedes all prior agreements, understandings, and negotiations on this subject. This agreement may be amended only in writing signed by both parties; an amendment that re-papers a covenant during employment requires its own consideration, such as genuine forbearance from termination or tangible new value. A party's failure to enforce any provision does not waive that party's right to enforce it later. This agreement may be executed in counterparts, including by electronic signature, each of which is an original.

Signatures

By signing this agreement, each party acknowledges and agrees to the restrictive covenant obligations above. Employee confirms having read and understood each provision, including the Cover Terms.

Employer

Employer: [Legal name of the employer]

Signature:

Signatory Name: [Full name of the authorized signatory signing for the employer]

Title: [Title of the authorized signatory signing for the employer]

Date:

Employee

Signature:

Print Name: [Full legal name of the employee]

Date:

Authored by OpenAgreements contributors. Wisconsin-specific analysis informed by the quote-verified Wisconsin practice note. Licensed under CC BY 4.0.