On this pageCover Terms
Tailor this agreementKey terms are editable before you download
Key terms

Pre-filled with this template’s default. Edit a term and your download uses your value.

Employee Restrictive Covenant Agreement

Cover Terms

The terms below are incorporated into and form part of this agreement.

Employer[Legal name of the employer]
Employee[Full legal name of the employee]
Employee Title / Position
Effective Date[Effective date of this agreement]
Governing LawNew Jersey
Confidentiality
Trade Secrets DurationPerpetual
Other Confidential Information Duration24 months
Employee Non-Solicitation
Duration24 months
Market benchmark 24 months · modal of 67 filed agreements

Reference only — not part of this agreement.

New Jersey sets no statutory cap on duration; enforceability turns on the holistic Solari/Whitmyer reasonableness test rather than a fixed number. 24 months matches the modal employee non-solicit term observed in benchmarked, publicly-filed employee agreements; 12 months is the common lighter alternative, and counsel should size the term to the employer's actual legitimate interest.

View more details in benchmark survey (as of July 3, 2026) →
Customer Non-Solicitation
Duration12 months
Market benchmark 12 months · modal of 67 filed agreements

Reference only — not part of this agreement.

New Jersey sets no statutory cap; a customer non-solicit maps directly onto the employer's customer-relationship interest and is often the better instrument than a full non-compete. 12 months is the lighter side of the near-even 12/24-month split observed in benchmarked, publicly-filed employee agreements — a conservative duration counsel should size to the actual customer relationships protected.

View more details in benchmark survey (as of July 3, 2026) →
Non-Competition
Duration12 months
Market benchmark 12 months · modal of 70 filed agreements

Reference only — not part of this agreement.

New Jersey imposes no statutory cap on duration; courts weigh time and territory together against the employer's real legitimate interest under the common-law reasonableness test, so there is no safe-harbor number, though durations in the one-to-two-year range are commonly upheld where the geography is tailored. 12 months matches the modal non-compete term observed in benchmarked, publicly-filed employee agreements — a conservative default counsel should size to the actual role and market rather than copy from another form.

View more details in benchmark survey (as of July 3, 2026) →
Restricted Territorythe geographic area in which Employee provided services
Competitive Business[Description of the business activities that constitute competition with the employer.]
Specified Competitors
No Business with Covered Customers
Duration12 months
Non-Investment
Duration12 months
Non-Disparagement
Duration24 months

Standard Terms

1. Defined Terms

“Competitive Business” means the business activities described in Cover Terms under Competitive Business.

“Confidential Information” means non-public information relating to Employer's business, including trade secrets, customer lists, pricing, business processes, technical data, and strategic plans, but excluding information that becomes public through no fault of Employee and the general knowledge, skill, and experience Employee acquired during employment.

“Covered Customers” means customers, vendors, referral sources, and business partners with whom Employee had material contact or for whom Employee had responsibility during the 12 months before termination of employment.

“Covered Employees” means employees with whom Employee worked or whom Employee managed during the 12 months before termination of employment.

“Passive Public Holdings” means ownership of securities of a publicly traded company representing less than five percent of any class of such company's securities, and interests in diversified mutual funds, index funds, and exchange-traded funds that may hold securities of a Competitive Business.

“Protected Interests” means the legitimate business interests a New Jersey covenant may protect under the common-law reasonableness rule, namely Employer's trade secrets as defined by the New Jersey Trade Secrets Act (N.J.S.A. 56:15-2), Employer's confidential business information, and Employer's customer relationships, but not Employer's interest in avoiding ordinary competition or the employee's general skill and knowledge.

“Restricted Period” means the duration specified in Cover Terms for each covenant, beginning on the date Employee's employment with Employer ends for any reason.

“Restricted Territory” means the geographic area described in Cover Terms under Restricted Territory.

“Solicit” means to directly or indirectly contact, approach, induce, encourage, or provide Confidential Information to any person or entity for the purpose of diverting business away from Employer, but does not include responding to general advertisements or unsolicited inquiries not initiated by Employee.

“Trade Secrets” has the meaning given in the New Jersey Trade Secrets Act, N.J.S.A. 56:15-2.

2. Recitals and Legitimate Interests

Employer and Employee acknowledge that each restrictive covenant in this agreement is intended to protect one or more of Employer's Protected Interests and to impose no restraint greater than is reasonable for that protection. The recognized Protected Interests are Employer's trade secrets, confidential business information, and customer relationships; a covenant that merely suppresses ordinary competition or the employee's general skill and knowledge protects nothing this agreement is meant to protect. The parties acknowledge that Employer would not provide Employee with access to these Protected Interests absent the protections in this agreement. Each covenant is intended to be reasonable in time, territory, and scope, to impose no undue hardship on Employee, and to cause no injury to the public.

Drafting Note The reasonableness gate

New Jersey has no general non-compete statute for the ordinary workforce, so every post-employment covenant in the agreement stands or falls on the common-law three-part reasonableness test: a restraint is given effect only where it protects a legitimate employer interest, imposes no undue hardship on the employee, and is not injurious to the public . The recognized legitimate interests are a narrow set — trade secrets, confidential business information, and customer relationships — so a covenant reaching beyond them to suppress ordinary competition or the employee's general skill and knowledge protects nothing the doctrine recognizes, and a court weighs each covenant's reasonableness prong by prong before enforcing it . Adequate consideration establishes only that a covenant is supported, not that it is reasonable, so each covenant clears the test on its own footing; a restraint confined to identified competitors is stronger evidence that it protects a genuine interest than one drawn against competition at large, and the test travels with the instrument — an assignee enforcing the covenant must still show a legitimate interest, no undue hardship, and no public injury on the facts as they then stand. A covenant tied to the sale of a business is measured more leniently as protection of the goodwill sold, so a restraint borrowed from that setting is measured against a standard it was never sized to .

Drafting Note Reasonableness

New Jersey's employer-friendly consideration rule does not excuse an unreasonable restraint. Continued employment can supply the consideration that supports the covenant, but consideration establishes only that the covenant is supported, not that it is reasonable — the restraint itself still stands or falls on the Solari/Whitmyer test of duration, territory, and scope, so a covenant adequately supported yet overbroad on any of those dimensions fails on reasonableness .

Drafting Note Protectable interests

A New Jersey covenant that blocks competition disconnected from a protectable interest protects nothing the doctrine recognizes. The recognized legitimate interests are a narrow set — trade secrets, confidential information, and customer relationships — so a restraint reaching beyond them to suppress ordinary competition or an employee's general skill and knowledge is exposed on the legitimate-interest prong, while trade-secret protection has its own home in a confidentiality and Trade Secrets Act remedy that runs alongside the covenant rather than inside it .

3. Timing, Consideration, and Employee Acknowledgements

The parties acknowledge that this agreement is supported by adequate consideration. If Employee is an existing employee, the parties agree that the continuation of Employee's employment after acknowledging the covenants in this agreement is itself sufficient consideration, and no separate payment, raise, or promotion is required. If this agreement is signed at the outset of employment, the offer and commencement of employment is the consideration. Employee acknowledges having had the opportunity to consult with independent legal counsel before signing this agreement. Employee acknowledges that the restrictions in this agreement are reasonable and necessary to protect Employer's Protected Interests, and understands that adequate consideration establishes only that the covenants are supported, not that they are reasonable, and that each covenant must independently be reasonable in the interest it protects, the hardship it imposes, and its effect on the public. This agreement is effective as of the Effective Date listed in Cover Terms.

4. Confidential Information and Trade Secret Protection

Employee must treat all Confidential Information as strictly confidential. Employee must not use or disclose Confidential Information except as required to perform authorized job duties or with Employer's prior written consent. Employee's obligations regarding trade secrets continue in perpetuity, for as long as the information remains a trade secret. Employee's obligations regarding other Confidential Information continue for the period specified in Cover Terms. This confidentiality obligation is intended to operate alongside, and independent of, any restrictive covenant, and does not restrict Employee's use of the general knowledge, skill, and experience Employee acquired during employment.

5. Permitted Disclosures and Protected Conduct

Nothing in this agreement prohibits Employee from: (a) reporting possible violations of law to any government agency, including the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, or any other federal, state, or local agency; (b) making disclosures protected under whistleblower provisions of any law; (c) discussing wages, hours, or other terms and conditions of employment as protected by applicable law, including Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. § 157); (d) testifying truthfully in legal proceedings; or (e) filing a sealed complaint in court using Confidential Information without liability. Pursuant to the Defend Trade Secrets Act (18 U.S.C. § 1833(b)), Employee may not be held criminally or civilly liable for disclosing a trade secret in confidence to a government official or attorney solely for the purpose of reporting or investigating a suspected violation of law, or in a sealed court filing.

6. Return, Deletion, and Certification of Company Property

Upon termination of employment, Employee must promptly return to Employer all documents, devices, files, credentials, and other materials containing or relating to Confidential Information. Where permitted, Employee must permanently delete electronic copies of Confidential Information from personal devices and accounts. Employee must certify compliance with this section in writing upon Employer's request. The parties intend that these return, deletion, and certification mechanics serve as part of Employer's efforts reasonable under the circumstances to maintain the secrecy of its trade secrets, as contemplated by the New Jersey Trade Secrets Act, N.J.S.A. 56:15-2.

7. Non-Solicitation of Employees

During the Restricted Period, Employee must not Solicit, recruit, hire, or attempt to hire any Covered Employee. This restriction does not prohibit Employee from providing a professional reference upon request or from hiring a person who responds to a general advertisement not directed specifically at Employer's employees. This covenant reaches only Covered Employees during the Restricted Period and is no broader than necessary to protect Employer's workforce stability and customer relationships.

8. Non-Solicitation of Customers, Vendors, Referral Sources, and Business Partners

During the Restricted Period, Employee must not Solicit the business of any Covered Customer. This covenant reaches only Covered Customers with whom Employee had material contact and is no broader than necessary to protect Employer's customer relationships.

Drafting Note Customer non-solicitation

A customer non-solicit that reaches every client regardless of the employee's contact with them is overbroad on its face. New Jersey courts blue-pencil overbroad non-solicitation clauses, so a covenant confined to customers the employee actually served or learned about survives as drawn, while a broader one is narrowed by the court to whatever reasonably protects the employer's interest .

Drafting Note Tiered solicitation restraints

The solicitation restraints hold when they track relationships the employee actually had. Tiered restrictive covenants built around real customer and coworker relationships have been upheld as furthering legitimate business interests and complying with New Jersey public policy, and an overbroad one is blue-penciled to a reasonable scope rather than discarded . A customer non-solicit reaching only Covered Customers the employee had material contact with maps directly onto the customer-relationship interest and, backstopped by the confidentiality and Trade Secrets Act protections, is often a stronger and more readily enforceable restraint than a broad non-compete. The employee non-solicit is the lightest restraint in the family and holds where it reaches only Covered Employees through the look-back window; a no-business-with-covered-customers covenant presses hardest on the undue-hardship and public-interest prongs because it reaches unsolicited business, so it survives only where it is sized tightly to those same relationships.

9. No Business with Covered Customers

During the Restricted Period, Employee must not accept, service, or do business with any Covered Customer, regardless of whether Employee or the Covered Customer first initiated contact. This restriction is broader than non-solicitation because it applies even if the Covered Customer approaches Employee, and it is sized tightly to the customer relationships it protects, reaching only Covered Customers with whom Employee had material contact.

10. Non-Competition

During the Restricted Period, Employee must not engage in, be employed by, consult for, or have an active ownership interest in any Competitive Business within the Restricted Territory. This covenant exists to protect Employer's Protected Interests — its trade secrets, confidential business information, and customer relationships — and not to restrain ordinary competition or the general skill and knowledge Employee acquired. The parties intend this covenant to protect Employer's legitimate interests, to impose no undue hardship on Employee, and to cause no injury to the public, with its time and territory sized to Employee's actual role and Employer's actual market. If Employer has identified specific competitors in Cover Terms under Specified Competitors, the parties intend this covenant to be understood and, if necessary, enforced as limited to those named competitors. Passive Public Holdings are permitted.

Drafting Note Duration and territory

A New Jersey court weighs duration and territory as a whole against the employer's real market, with no safe-harbor number, so a fixed term or radius copied from another form is measured against a market it was never sized to. A restraint matched to the employee's actual role and the employer's genuine footprint is far easier to defend, while a long, open-ended, or statewide ban is exposed on the undue-hardship and public-interest prongs .

11. Non-Investment

During the Restricted Period, Employee must not acquire or hold any active ownership interest in, serve as a director, officer, manager, or advisor to, or have material economic participation in any Competitive Business. This restriction primarily targets active or material ownership in private competitors. Because this covenant restrains active roles at and material participation in a Competitive Business, it is a post-employment restraint drawn no broader than necessary to protect Employer's Protected Interests. Passive Public Holdings are permitted.

12. Non-Disparagement

During the Restricted Period specified in Cover Terms for Non-Disparagement, Employee must not make statements that are intended to or reasonably likely to disparage Employer, its officers, directors, employees, products, or services. This section does not restrict Employee from making truthful statements in legal proceedings, providing truthful testimony, making disclosures to government agencies, or exercising rights protected by law, including rights protected under Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act. Consistent with the discrimination-claim concealment carve-out below, no part of this section has the purpose or effect of concealing the details relating to a claim of discrimination, retaliation, or harassment.

13. Discrimination, Retaliation, and Harassment Claims Not Concealed

No provision of this agreement, including any confidentiality or non-disparagement obligation, has the purpose or effect of concealing the details relating to a claim of discrimination, retaliation, or harassment. Under N.J.S.A. 10:5-12.8(a), such a provision is against public policy and unenforceable against a current or former employee, whatever the label on the clause. This carve-out is surgical: N.J.S.A. 10:5-12.8(c) expressly preserves an employer's agreement that the employee not compete and not disclose proprietary information, so the covenant suite in this agreement remains intact and only the claim-details concealment is excluded.

Drafting Note Claim confidentiality

A confidentiality or non-disparagement clause that would conceal the details of a discrimination, retaliation, or harassment claim is unenforceable in New Jersey, and a party that tries to enforce it is exposed to the employee's attorney fees and costs. The bar turns on the provision's purpose or effect rather than its label, so a concealment clause dressed as ordinary confidentiality falls the same way .

Drafting Note The discrimination-claim concealment bar

A confidentiality or non-disparagement term that would conceal the details of a discrimination, retaliation, or harassment claim is unenforceable against the employee, and the label on the clause does not control . The exposure runs one way: a party that enforces or attempts to enforce a barred concealment provision is liable for the employee's reasonable attorney fees and costs, so any fee-shifting in the agreement is read against that asymmetry . The bar is surgical rather than a threat to the covenant suite — the same statute expressly preserves an agreement not to compete and not to disclose proprietary information, so only the claim-details concealment is excluded and the covenants remain intact .

14. No Practice Restrictions for Lawyers

If Employee is a lawyer, no provision of this agreement restricts Employee's right to practice law after the relationship ends, apart from an agreement concerning benefits upon retirement. RPC 5.6 bars a lawyer from participating in offering or making a partnership or employment agreement that restricts post-termination practice rights. Any covenant in this agreement is void to the extent it would operate as such a restriction on a lawyer, including on in-house or corporate counsel practicing in New Jersey.

Drafting Note The attorney practice-restriction bar

A covenant that restrains a lawyer's practice after the relationship ends is void, apart from an agreement concerning retirement benefits. RPC 5.6 bars a lawyer from participating in a partnership or employment agreement that restricts post-termination practice rights , and that bar reaches indirect financial disincentives — such as compensation forfeitures aimed at a departing lawyer who keeps serving firm clients — not just outright bans, so a clause dressed as a forfeiture rather than a prohibition still falls as against public policy . The bar reaches in-house and corporate counsel practicing in New Jersey whether or not admitted in the State, so an employer cannot bind its in-house lawyers with a restraint RPC 5.6 would forbid for outside counsel .

15. No Client-Access Restrictions for Psychologists

If Employee is a licensed psychologist, no provision of this agreement interferes with or restricts a client's ability to see or continue to see his or her therapist of choice. N.J.A.C. 13:42-10.16 forbids a licensed psychologist from entering into any business agreement that so interferes. This bar operates independently of the common-law reasonableness weighing: a covenant whose duration and territory look reasonable still fails to the extent it would cut a client off from the treating psychologist, and any such covenant in this agreement is void to that extent.

Drafting Note The psychologist client-access bar

A covenant that would keep a client from continuing with a chosen psychologist is void to that extent, independent of how its time and territory read. N.J.A.C. 13:42-10.16 forbids a licensed psychologist from entering any business agreement that interferes with or restricts a client's ability to see the therapist of choice , and the uniquely personal patient-psychologist relationship forbids restraints that interrupt an ongoing course of treatment . The rule shifts the focus from the psychologist's rights to the patient's, so a covenant whose duration and territory look reasonable still fails to the extent it cuts a client off from the treating psychologist .

16. Physician and Health Care Practitioner Covenants

If Employee is a physician, any covenant in this agreement restraining Employee from the practice of medicine is drawn against New Jersey's heightened public-interest scrutiny for physician covenants and not as an ordinary commercial restraint. Any physician covenant in this agreement uses a narrow radius and a short term, preserves patient access and continuity of care, and is enforced only to the extent it survives that heightened scrutiny under the common-law reasonableness rule.

Drafting Note Physician covenant public-interest scrutiny

A covenant restraining a physician from practicing medicine is not measured as an ordinary commercial restraint. Physician covenants are not per se void, but the public-interest prong carries the analysis: the New Jersey Supreme Court applied the three-part test to a physician covenant and reduced its geographic reach so enforcement would not impair the public's access to care, rather than voiding it , and the trial court must find that the covenant protects a legitimate interest, imposes no undue hardship, and is not adverse to the public interest . A physician covenant drawn to a narrow radius and a short term, tied to preserving patient access and continuity of care, is the one that survives that heightened scrutiny; a broader one is exposed to being narrowed or defeated on the public-interest prong regardless of how its duration and territory read in isolation. No enacted New Jersey statute bans health-care non-competes, so this scrutiny, not a categorical prohibition, is what a physician covenant is measured against.

17. No Conflicting Obligations

Employee represents that performing duties for Employer and complying with this agreement does not conflict with any prior agreement, court order, or legal obligation binding on Employee. Employee must promptly disclose to Employer any potential conflict that arises during employment.

18. Notice to Future Employers and Other Third Parties

Employer may disclose the existence and terms of this agreement to any prospective employer or business associate of Employee if Employer has a reasonable belief that Employee may breach this agreement. Employee consents to this disclosure. Any such disclosure is kept factual and tied to the covenant's actual terms.

19. Tolling During Breach

If Employee breaches any restrictive covenant in this agreement, the Restricted Period for that covenant is tolled and extended for the period during which Employee is in actual violation of the covenant, so that the full duration of the restriction runs from the date the violation ends. The extension is tied to Employee's actual violation and not to the mere passage of time or the pendency of litigation. The parties do not intend an automatic, open-ended, or indefinite extension.

Drafting Note Tolling

A tolling clause that runs only while the former employee is actually violating the covenant, as determined by a court, is the one New Jersey enforces. Tolling tied to a real breach is given effect, but restrictive covenants are not favored and gratuitous extension is disfavored, so an automatic, indefinite extension is exposed to being found unreasonable .

20. Remedies

Employee acknowledges that a breach of this agreement may cause Employer irreparable harm for which money damages would be inadequate. Employer may seek injunctive or other equitable relief in addition to any other remedies available at law, including relief under the New Jersey Trade Secrets Act (N.J.S.A. 56:15-1 et seq.), under which actual or threatened misappropriation of a trade secret may be enjoined independent of any covenant.

21. Enforceability and Severability

If any provision of this agreement is found to be unenforceable, the remaining provisions remain in full force and effect. Each restrictive covenant in this agreement is intended to be independently enforceable, so that a court's refusal to enforce one covenant, or a court's decision to enforce a covenant only to a reasonable extent, does not affect the others.

22. Reformation

If any restraint in this agreement is found to be overbroad, Employer requests that a court enforce it to the extent reasonable rather than declining to enforce it at all. That latitude is no license to overreach: reformation is an equitable remedy, so each restrictive covenant in this agreement is drawn as a tiered, severable, reasonable restraint sized to the Protected Interests from the start and is intended to be enforceable as written rather than in reliance on judicial revision.

Drafting Note Reformation

New Jersey's reformation power is not a safety net for an aggressive covenant. Reformation is an equitable remedy, so a covenant drawn from the start as a tiered, severable, reasonable restraint is enforced as written, while a court narrowing in equity may decline to rescue one it views as overreaching .

Drafting Note Reformation as an equitable backstop

Reformation is a backstop, not a license to overreach. New Jersey abandoned the void-per-se rule in favor of total or partial enforcement of a covenant to the extent reasonable, and curtailing an overbroad covenant's scope is the approach the state's courts prescribe . But reformation is an equitable remedy, so a covenant drawn from the start as a tiered, severable, reasonable restraint sized to the Protected Interests is enforced as written, while an aggressive one is exposed to a court that declines to rewrite it. That exposure carries into enforcement conduct: a notice to a future employer built on a covenant that later fails or is narrowed can support a tortious-interference claim, so a disclosure kept factual and tied to a restraint defensible on all three prongs stays within the good-faith posture the reformation power rewards .

23. Survival and Expiration of Each Covenant

Each restrictive covenant in this agreement survives the termination of Employee's employment for the Restricted Period specified in Cover Terms. Obligations under the Confidential Information and Trade Secret Protection section survive indefinitely to the extent they relate to trade secrets. All other provisions survive to the extent necessary to enforce rights that arose during employment.

24. Assignment and Successors

Employee may not assign this agreement or any rights or obligations under it. Employer may assign this agreement to any affiliate, successor, or acquirer of all or substantially all of Employer's business or assets. This agreement is binding on and inures to the benefit of the parties and their respective heirs, successors, and permitted assigns.

25. Governing Law, Venue, and Dispute Process

This agreement is governed by the law listed in Cover Terms. Disputes will be resolved in the courts of the Governing Law state, subject to non-waivable rights under applicable law. The parties intend that the governing-law and venue choices match where Employee actually lives and works, because a clause selecting another state's law requires the enforceability analysis to be re-run under that state's doctrine.

26. Entire Agreement, Amendment, Waiver, and Electronic Signatures

This agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties regarding its subject matter and supersedes all prior agreements, understandings, and negotiations on this subject. This agreement may be amended only in writing signed by both parties. A party's failure to enforce any provision does not waive that party's right to enforce it later. This agreement may be executed in counterparts, including by electronic signature, each of which is an original.

Signatures

By signing this agreement, each party acknowledges and agrees to the restrictive covenant obligations above. Employee confirms having read and understood each provision, including the Cover Terms.

Employer

Employer: [Legal name of the employer]

Signature:

Signatory Name: [Full name of the authorized signatory signing for the employer]

Title: [Title of the authorized signatory signing for the employer]

Date:

Employee

Signature:

Print Name: [Full legal name of the employee]

Date:

Authored by OpenAgreements contributors. New Jersey-specific analysis informed by the quote-verified New Jersey practice note. Licensed under CC BY 4.0.