SOC 2 Readiness Assessment
Assess readiness for a SOC 2 Type II audit. This skill walks through the Trust Services Criteria, identifies gaps, maps to NIST controls, and generates a prioritized remediation plan.
Security Model
- No scripts executed — markdown-only procedural guidance
- No secrets required — works with reference checklists
- IP-clean — AICPA Trust Services Criteria are publicly cited; descriptions are original writing
- Evidence stays local — all collection outputs go to local filesystem
When to Use
Activate this skill when:
- First SOC 2 preparation — building controls from scratch for initial Type I or Type II
- Pre-audit readiness check — 4-8 weeks before audit window opens
- Gap analysis after scope change — new systems, services, or trust criteria added
- Remediation planning — translating audit findings into actionable work items
- Dual-framework mapping — already pursuing ISO 27001 and need SOC 2 overlap analysis
Do NOT use for:
- ISO 27001 internal audit — use
iso-27001-internal-audit
- Evidence collection mechanics — use
iso-27001-evidence-collection
- Contract review — use legal agreement skills
Core Concepts
Trust Services Criteria (TSC)
SOC 2 is organized around 5 Trust Services Categories. Security (CC) is always in scope; others are optional based on your service:
| Category |
Criteria |
When Required |
| Security (CC) |
CC 1-9 (33 criteria) |
Always required |
| Availability (A) |
A 1.1-1.3 (3 criteria) |
SaaS with uptime SLAs |
| Processing Integrity (PI) |
PI 1.1-1.5 (4 criteria) |
Data processing services |
| Confidentiality © |
C 1.1-1.2 (2 criteria) |
Handling confidential data |
| Privacy (P) |
P 4-8 (7 criteria) |
PII processing |
SOC 2 vs. ISO 27001
| Dimension |
SOC 2 |
ISO 27001 |
| Governing body |
AICPA |
ISO/IEC |
| Geography |
Primarily US/Canada |
Global |
| Type |
Attestation report by CPA |
Certification by audit body |
| Scope |
Service-specific |
Organization-wide ISMS |
| Controls |
Flexible (you define) |
93 Annex A controls |
| Output |
SOC 2 report (restricted/general use) |
Certificate |
| Overlap |
~70% overlap with ISO 27001 Annex A |
~70% overlap with SOC 2 CC |
Decision Tree: Scope Selection
What service are you getting audited on?
├── SaaS product → Security + Availability (+ Confidentiality if you handle sensitive data)
├── Data processing → Security + Processing Integrity + Confidentiality
├── Infrastructure → Security + Availability
├── API service → Security (+ PI if you transform data)
│
Do you handle PII?
├── YES → Add Privacy category
├── NO → Skip Privacy
│
Do you have uptime SLAs?
├── YES → Include Availability
├── NO → Optional (but customers expect it for SaaS)
Step-by-Step Workflow
Step 1: Define Scope and Categories
- Identify the service being audited (product name, description, boundaries)
- Select Trust Services Categories using the decision tree above
- Define system boundaries: infrastructure, software, people, procedures, data
- Document sub-service organizations (cloud providers, payment processors, etc.)
- Determine audit type: Type I (point-in-time) or Type II (period of time, usually 6-12 months)
Step 2: Assess Current State
For each applicable Common Criterion (CC), assess whether controls are:
- Designed — control exists on paper
- Implemented — control is operating
- Effective — control achieves its objective (evidence exists)
# If Internal ISO Audit MCP server is available (SOC 2 maps to ISO 27001 Annex A):
list_controls(domain="technological") # List tech controls (maps to CC 6-8)
get_control_guidance(control_id="A.5.15") # Get guidance for ISO control mapped from CC 6.1
get_nist_mapping(control_id="AC-2", direction="nist_to_iso") # Find ISO controls from NIST reference
search_guidance(query="incident response") # Search for controls matching SOC 2 criteria
Step 3: Map Controls to Criteria
Each CC maps to specific NIST controls. Use this mapping to identify what you need:
CC 1 — Control Environment
| Criterion |
Focus |
NIST Controls |
ISO Cross-Reference |
| CC 1.1 |
Integrity and ethics |
PS-1, PS-3, PS-6 |
A.6.1, A.6.2, A.6.4 |
| CC 1.2 |
Board oversight |
PM-1, PM-2 |
C.5.1, C.5.3 |
| CC 1.3 |
Organizational structure |
PM-2 |
C.5.3 |
| CC 1.4 |
Competence commitment |
AT-2, PS-3 |
A.6.1, A.6.3 |
| CC 1.5 |
Accountability |
PS-3, PS-4 |
A.6.4, A.6.5 |
CC 2 — Communication and Information
| Criterion |
Focus |
NIST Controls |
ISO Cross-Reference |
| CC 2.1 |
Internal information |
AU-2, SI-5 |
C.7.5.1 |
| CC 2.2 |
Internal communication |
PM-2, AT-2 |
C.7.4, A.6.3 |
| CC 2.3 |
External communication |
PM-1 |
A.5.14 |
CC 3 — Risk Assessment
| Criterion |
Focus |
NIST Controls |
ISO Cross-Reference |
| CC 3.1 |
Risk objectives |
PM-9, RA-1 |
C.6.1.1 |
| CC 3.2 |
Risk identification |
RA-3 |
C.6.1.2, C.8.2 |
| CC 3.3 |
Fraud risk |
RA-3 |
C.6.1.2 |
| CC 3.4 |
Change impact |
RA-3, CM-4 |
C.6.1.2, A.8.9 |
CC 4 — Monitoring Activities
| Criterion |
Focus |
NIST Controls |
ISO Cross-Reference |
| CC 4.1 |
Ongoing monitoring |
CA-7, PM-6 |
C.9.1 |
| CC 4.2 |
Deficiency evaluation |
CA-2 |
C.9.2.1 |
CC 5 — Control Activities
| Criterion |
Focus |
NIST Controls |
ISO Cross-Reference |
| CC 5.1 |
Risk mitigation |
AC-5 |
A.5.3 |
| CC 5.2 |
Technology controls |
AC-1, IA-2 |
A.5.15, A.8.5 |
| CC 5.3 |
Policy deployment |
PM-1, PL-1 |
A.5.1, C.5.2 |
CC 6 — Logical and Physical Access
| Criterion |
Focus |
NIST Controls |
ISO Cross-Reference |
| CC 6.1 |
Access control |
AC-2, AC-3, IA-2, SC-28 |
A.5.15, A.8.5, A.8.24 |
| CC 6.2 |
Access provisioning |
AC-2, PS-4, PS-5 |
A.5.18, A.6.5 |
| CC 6.3 |
Access modification |
AC-2, AC-6 |
A.5.15, A.5.18 |
| CC 6.4 |
Physical access |
PE-2, PE-3, PE-6 |
A.7.2, A.7.4 |
| CC 6.5 |
Asset disposal |
MP-6 |
A.7.10, A.7.14 |
| CC 6.6 |
Threat detection |
RA-5, SI-4 |
A.8.8, A.8.16 |
| CC 6.7 |
Transmission security |
SC-8 |
A.5.14, A.8.24 |
| CC 6.8 |
Malware prevention |
SI-2, SI-3 |
A.8.7, A.8.19 |
CC 7 — System Operations
| Criterion |
Focus |
NIST Controls |
ISO Cross-Reference |
| CC 7.1 |
Operational monitoring |
CM-6, RA-5 |
A.8.9, A.8.8 |
| CC 7.2 |
Anomaly detection |
AU-6, SI-4 |
A.8.15, A.8.16 |
| CC 7.3 |
Incident response |
IR-4 |
A.5.24, A.5.25 |
| CC 7.4 |
Incident management |
IR-5, IR-6 |
A.5.25, A.5.26 |
| CC 7.5 |
Recovery |
CP-4, CP-9, CP-10 |
A.5.30, A.8.13 |
CC 8 — Change Management
| Criterion |
Focus |
NIST Controls |
ISO Cross-Reference |
| CC 8.1 |
Change control |
CM-3, CM-5, SA-3 |
A.8.9, A.8.25, A.8.32 |
CC 9 — Risk Mitigation
| Criterion |
Focus |
NIST Controls |
ISO Cross-Reference |
| CC 9.1 |
Risk mitigation |
CP-2, RA-7 |
A.5.30, C.6.1.3 |
| CC 9.2 |
Vendor management |
AC-20, SA-9 |
A.5.19, A.5.22 |
Step 4: Generate Gap Analysis
For each criterion, document:
## Gap: [CC x.x] — [Brief description]
**Current State**: [What exists today]
**Required State**: [What the auditor expects]
**Gap**: [What's missing]
**Remediation**:
1. [Specific action item]
2. [Specific action item]
**Priority**: Critical / High / Medium / Low
**Effort**: [Days/weeks to remediate]
**Owner**: [Person responsible]
**Evidence Needed**: [What to collect after fix]
Step 5: Build Remediation Plan
Prioritize gaps by:
- Critical — Audit will fail without this (CC 6.1, 6.2, 7.2, 7.5, 8.1)
- High — Likely finding if not addressed (CC 1.4, 3.2, 6.6, 7.3)
- Medium — Auditor will note but may not be a finding
- Low — Best practice, not strictly required
Step 6: Readiness Report
Generate a structured readiness assessment:
- Executive summary — overall readiness percentage, estimated time to audit-ready
- Scope — service description, trust categories, audit type
- Control matrix — all applicable criteria with status (designed/implemented/effective)
- Gap analysis — prioritized list of gaps with remediation plan
- Timeline — remediation milestones leading to audit window
Quick Reference: Top SOC 2 Failures
| # |
Criterion |
Common Failure |
Fix |
| 1 |
CC 6.1 |
MFA not universal |
Enforce MFA on all systems with sensitive data |
| 2 |
CC 6.2 |
Access not revoked on termination |
Automate deprovisioning; verify within 24h |
| 3 |
CC 7.2 |
No log monitoring |
Configure alerts for auth failures, privilege changes |
| 4 |
CC 8.1 |
No change management |
Require PR reviews; document deployment process |
| 5 |
CC 7.5 |
Backups never tested |
Restore from backup quarterly; document results |
| 6 |
CC 3.2 |
No risk assessment |
Conduct and document annual risk assessment |
| 7 |
CC 6.6 |
No vulnerability scanning |
Deploy automated scanning; remediate criticals in 30d |
| 8 |
CC 1.4 |
Security training incomplete |
Require annual training; track completion |
| 9 |
CC 9.2 |
Vendor risk not assessed |
Maintain vendor register; collect SOC 2 reports |
| 10 |
CC 7.3 |
No incident response plan |
Document plan; conduct tabletop exercise |
DO / DON’T
DO
- Start with Security (CC) criteria — they’re always required and cover ~80% of effort
- Map to ISO 27001 if pursuing both frameworks — ~70% control overlap
- Collect evidence throughout the audit period, not just at audit time
- Include sub-service organizations in your description
- Define the audit period before starting evidence collection
DON’T
- Include trust categories you can’t support — better to pass on fewer than fail on more
- Assume Type I is “easy” — it requires all controls to be designed and implemented
- Forget the system description — auditors review this first and use it to scope their testing
- Use generic/template control descriptions — auditors expect your controls to match your actual environment
- Ignore complementary user entity controls (CUECs) — your customers need to know their responsibilities
Troubleshooting
| Problem |
Solution |
| First SOC 2, no existing controls |
Start with CC 6 (access) and CC 8 (change management) — fastest to implement |
| Already have ISO 27001 |
Map Annex A controls to SOC 2 CC; ~70% are already covered |
| Auditor requests evidence we don’t have |
Collect it now; document the process; note in description if control was implemented mid-period |
| Multiple environments (prod/staging/dev) |
Only production environment needs to be in scope; document boundaries clearly |
| Sub-service org (AWS/GCP/Azure) |
Use SOC 2 Type II report from the provider; document which controls they cover |
Rules
For detailed SOC 2-specific guidance:
| File |
Coverage |
rules/logical-access.md |
CC 6.1–6.8 — access control, provisioning, physical, threat detection |
rules/system-operations.md |
CC 7.1–7.5 — monitoring, anomaly detection, incident response, recovery |
rules/change-vendor-management.md |
CC 8.1, CC 9.1–9.2 — change control, risk mitigation, vendor management |
rules/control-environment.md |
CC 1.1–1.5 — governance, ethics, org structure, competence, accountability |
rules/risk-assessment.md |
CC 3.1–3.4 — risk objectives, identification, fraud risk, change impact |
rules/control-activities.md |
CC 5.1–5.3 — risk mitigation selection, technology controls, policy deployment |
rules/communication-info.md |
CC 2.1–2.3 — internal/external communication, information quality |
rules/monitoring-activities.md |
CC 4.1–4.2 — ongoing monitoring, deficiency evaluation |
rules/optional-categories.md |
A 1.x, PI 1.x, C 1.x — Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality |
rules/privacy-criteria.md |
P 1.x–8.x — Privacy criteria (when PII in scope) |
Attribution
SOC 2 criteria mapping and readiness procedures developed with Internal ISO Audit (Hazel Castro, ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, 14+ years, 100+ audits).
Runtime Detection
- Internal ISO Audit MCP server available (best) — Live ISO 27001 control guidance with NIST cross-references. SOC 2 criteria map to ISO 27001 Annex A controls (~70% overlap); use
get_nist_mapping for bidirectional lookup. Server: internalisoaudit.com/api/mcp
- Local compliance data available (good) — Reads
compliance/ directory with SOC 2 test metadata
- Reference only (baseline) — Uses embedded criteria mapping and checklists in
rules/
Connectors
For Internal ISO Audit MCP server setup, see CONNECTORS.md.