Agent skill

SOC 2 Readiness

soc2-readiness

Assess SOC 2 Type II readiness. Map Trust Services Criteria to controls, identify gaps, and build a remediation plan. Uses NIST SP 800-53 (public domain) as canonical reference with SOC 2 criterion cross-mapping. Use when user says "SOC 2 readiness," "SOC 2 preparation," "SOC 2 gap analysis," or "prepare for SOC 2 audit."

Compliance & filingsPractice guides
✓ Security reviewedApache-2.012 package files

Instructions

SKILL.md

View raw file ↗

SOC 2 Readiness Assessment

Assess readiness for a SOC 2 Type II audit. This skill walks through the Trust Services Criteria, identifies gaps, maps to NIST controls, and generates a prioritized remediation plan.

Security Model

  • No scripts executed — markdown-only procedural guidance
  • No secrets required — works with reference checklists
  • IP-clean — AICPA Trust Services Criteria are publicly cited; descriptions are original writing
  • Evidence stays local — all collection outputs go to local filesystem

When to Use

Activate this skill when:

  1. First SOC 2 preparation — building controls from scratch for initial Type I or Type II
  2. Pre-audit readiness check — 4-8 weeks before audit window opens
  3. Gap analysis after scope change — new systems, services, or trust criteria added
  4. Remediation planning — translating audit findings into actionable work items
  5. Dual-framework mapping — already pursuing ISO 27001 and need SOC 2 overlap analysis

Do NOT use for:

  • ISO 27001 internal audit — use iso-27001-internal-audit
  • Evidence collection mechanics — use iso-27001-evidence-collection
  • Contract review — use legal agreement skills

Core Concepts

Trust Services Criteria (TSC)

SOC 2 is organized around 5 Trust Services Categories. Security (CC) is always in scope; others are optional based on your service:

Category Criteria When Required
Security (CC) CC 1-9 (33 criteria) Always required
Availability (A) A 1.1-1.3 (3 criteria) SaaS with uptime SLAs
Processing Integrity (PI) PI 1.1-1.5 (4 criteria) Data processing services
Confidentiality © C 1.1-1.2 (2 criteria) Handling confidential data
Privacy (P) P 4-8 (7 criteria) PII processing

SOC 2 vs. ISO 27001

Dimension SOC 2 ISO 27001
Governing body AICPA ISO/IEC
Geography Primarily US/Canada Global
Type Attestation report by CPA Certification by audit body
Scope Service-specific Organization-wide ISMS
Controls Flexible (you define) 93 Annex A controls
Output SOC 2 report (restricted/general use) Certificate
Overlap ~70% overlap with ISO 27001 Annex A ~70% overlap with SOC 2 CC

Decision Tree: Scope Selection

What service are you getting audited on?
├── SaaS product → Security + Availability (+ Confidentiality if you handle sensitive data)
├── Data processing → Security + Processing Integrity + Confidentiality
├── Infrastructure → Security + Availability
├── API service → Security (+ PI if you transform data)
│
Do you handle PII?
├── YES → Add Privacy category
├── NO → Skip Privacy
│
Do you have uptime SLAs?
├── YES → Include Availability
├── NO → Optional (but customers expect it for SaaS)

Step-by-Step Workflow

Step 1: Define Scope and Categories

  1. Identify the service being audited (product name, description, boundaries)
  2. Select Trust Services Categories using the decision tree above
  3. Define system boundaries: infrastructure, software, people, procedures, data
  4. Document sub-service organizations (cloud providers, payment processors, etc.)
  5. Determine audit type: Type I (point-in-time) or Type II (period of time, usually 6-12 months)

Step 2: Assess Current State

For each applicable Common Criterion (CC), assess whether controls are:

  • Designed — control exists on paper
  • Implemented — control is operating
  • Effective — control achieves its objective (evidence exists)
# If Internal ISO Audit MCP server is available (SOC 2 maps to ISO 27001 Annex A):
list_controls(domain="technological")                       # List tech controls (maps to CC 6-8)
get_control_guidance(control_id="A.5.15")                   # Get guidance for ISO control mapped from CC 6.1
get_nist_mapping(control_id="AC-2", direction="nist_to_iso")  # Find ISO controls from NIST reference
search_guidance(query="incident response")                  # Search for controls matching SOC 2 criteria

Step 3: Map Controls to Criteria

Each CC maps to specific NIST controls. Use this mapping to identify what you need:

CC 1 — Control Environment

Criterion Focus NIST Controls ISO Cross-Reference
CC 1.1 Integrity and ethics PS-1, PS-3, PS-6 A.6.1, A.6.2, A.6.4
CC 1.2 Board oversight PM-1, PM-2 C.5.1, C.5.3
CC 1.3 Organizational structure PM-2 C.5.3
CC 1.4 Competence commitment AT-2, PS-3 A.6.1, A.6.3
CC 1.5 Accountability PS-3, PS-4 A.6.4, A.6.5

CC 2 — Communication and Information

Criterion Focus NIST Controls ISO Cross-Reference
CC 2.1 Internal information AU-2, SI-5 C.7.5.1
CC 2.2 Internal communication PM-2, AT-2 C.7.4, A.6.3
CC 2.3 External communication PM-1 A.5.14

CC 3 — Risk Assessment

Criterion Focus NIST Controls ISO Cross-Reference
CC 3.1 Risk objectives PM-9, RA-1 C.6.1.1
CC 3.2 Risk identification RA-3 C.6.1.2, C.8.2
CC 3.3 Fraud risk RA-3 C.6.1.2
CC 3.4 Change impact RA-3, CM-4 C.6.1.2, A.8.9

CC 4 — Monitoring Activities

Criterion Focus NIST Controls ISO Cross-Reference
CC 4.1 Ongoing monitoring CA-7, PM-6 C.9.1
CC 4.2 Deficiency evaluation CA-2 C.9.2.1

CC 5 — Control Activities

Criterion Focus NIST Controls ISO Cross-Reference
CC 5.1 Risk mitigation AC-5 A.5.3
CC 5.2 Technology controls AC-1, IA-2 A.5.15, A.8.5
CC 5.3 Policy deployment PM-1, PL-1 A.5.1, C.5.2

CC 6 — Logical and Physical Access

Criterion Focus NIST Controls ISO Cross-Reference
CC 6.1 Access control AC-2, AC-3, IA-2, SC-28 A.5.15, A.8.5, A.8.24
CC 6.2 Access provisioning AC-2, PS-4, PS-5 A.5.18, A.6.5
CC 6.3 Access modification AC-2, AC-6 A.5.15, A.5.18
CC 6.4 Physical access PE-2, PE-3, PE-6 A.7.2, A.7.4
CC 6.5 Asset disposal MP-6 A.7.10, A.7.14
CC 6.6 Threat detection RA-5, SI-4 A.8.8, A.8.16
CC 6.7 Transmission security SC-8 A.5.14, A.8.24
CC 6.8 Malware prevention SI-2, SI-3 A.8.7, A.8.19

CC 7 — System Operations

Criterion Focus NIST Controls ISO Cross-Reference
CC 7.1 Operational monitoring CM-6, RA-5 A.8.9, A.8.8
CC 7.2 Anomaly detection AU-6, SI-4 A.8.15, A.8.16
CC 7.3 Incident response IR-4 A.5.24, A.5.25
CC 7.4 Incident management IR-5, IR-6 A.5.25, A.5.26
CC 7.5 Recovery CP-4, CP-9, CP-10 A.5.30, A.8.13

CC 8 — Change Management

Criterion Focus NIST Controls ISO Cross-Reference
CC 8.1 Change control CM-3, CM-5, SA-3 A.8.9, A.8.25, A.8.32

CC 9 — Risk Mitigation

Criterion Focus NIST Controls ISO Cross-Reference
CC 9.1 Risk mitigation CP-2, RA-7 A.5.30, C.6.1.3
CC 9.2 Vendor management AC-20, SA-9 A.5.19, A.5.22

Step 4: Generate Gap Analysis

For each criterion, document:

## Gap: [CC x.x] — [Brief description]

**Current State**: [What exists today]
**Required State**: [What the auditor expects]
**Gap**: [What's missing]
**Remediation**:
1. [Specific action item]
2. [Specific action item]
**Priority**: Critical / High / Medium / Low
**Effort**: [Days/weeks to remediate]
**Owner**: [Person responsible]
**Evidence Needed**: [What to collect after fix]

Step 5: Build Remediation Plan

Prioritize gaps by:

  1. Critical — Audit will fail without this (CC 6.1, 6.2, 7.2, 7.5, 8.1)
  2. High — Likely finding if not addressed (CC 1.4, 3.2, 6.6, 7.3)
  3. Medium — Auditor will note but may not be a finding
  4. Low — Best practice, not strictly required

Step 6: Readiness Report

Generate a structured readiness assessment:

  1. Executive summary — overall readiness percentage, estimated time to audit-ready
  2. Scope — service description, trust categories, audit type
  3. Control matrix — all applicable criteria with status (designed/implemented/effective)
  4. Gap analysis — prioritized list of gaps with remediation plan
  5. Timeline — remediation milestones leading to audit window

Quick Reference: Top SOC 2 Failures

# Criterion Common Failure Fix
1 CC 6.1 MFA not universal Enforce MFA on all systems with sensitive data
2 CC 6.2 Access not revoked on termination Automate deprovisioning; verify within 24h
3 CC 7.2 No log monitoring Configure alerts for auth failures, privilege changes
4 CC 8.1 No change management Require PR reviews; document deployment process
5 CC 7.5 Backups never tested Restore from backup quarterly; document results
6 CC 3.2 No risk assessment Conduct and document annual risk assessment
7 CC 6.6 No vulnerability scanning Deploy automated scanning; remediate criticals in 30d
8 CC 1.4 Security training incomplete Require annual training; track completion
9 CC 9.2 Vendor risk not assessed Maintain vendor register; collect SOC 2 reports
10 CC 7.3 No incident response plan Document plan; conduct tabletop exercise

DO / DON’T

DO

  • Start with Security (CC) criteria — they’re always required and cover ~80% of effort
  • Map to ISO 27001 if pursuing both frameworks — ~70% control overlap
  • Collect evidence throughout the audit period, not just at audit time
  • Include sub-service organizations in your description
  • Define the audit period before starting evidence collection

DON’T

  • Include trust categories you can’t support — better to pass on fewer than fail on more
  • Assume Type I is “easy” — it requires all controls to be designed and implemented
  • Forget the system description — auditors review this first and use it to scope their testing
  • Use generic/template control descriptions — auditors expect your controls to match your actual environment
  • Ignore complementary user entity controls (CUECs) — your customers need to know their responsibilities

Troubleshooting

Problem Solution
First SOC 2, no existing controls Start with CC 6 (access) and CC 8 (change management) — fastest to implement
Already have ISO 27001 Map Annex A controls to SOC 2 CC; ~70% are already covered
Auditor requests evidence we don’t have Collect it now; document the process; note in description if control was implemented mid-period
Multiple environments (prod/staging/dev) Only production environment needs to be in scope; document boundaries clearly
Sub-service org (AWS/GCP/Azure) Use SOC 2 Type II report from the provider; document which controls they cover

Rules

For detailed SOC 2-specific guidance:

File Coverage
rules/logical-access.md CC 6.1–6.8 — access control, provisioning, physical, threat detection
rules/system-operations.md CC 7.1–7.5 — monitoring, anomaly detection, incident response, recovery
rules/change-vendor-management.md CC 8.1, CC 9.1–9.2 — change control, risk mitigation, vendor management
rules/control-environment.md CC 1.1–1.5 — governance, ethics, org structure, competence, accountability
rules/risk-assessment.md CC 3.1–3.4 — risk objectives, identification, fraud risk, change impact
rules/control-activities.md CC 5.1–5.3 — risk mitigation selection, technology controls, policy deployment
rules/communication-info.md CC 2.1–2.3 — internal/external communication, information quality
rules/monitoring-activities.md CC 4.1–4.2 — ongoing monitoring, deficiency evaluation
rules/optional-categories.md A 1.x, PI 1.x, C 1.x — Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality
rules/privacy-criteria.md P 1.x–8.x — Privacy criteria (when PII in scope)

Attribution

SOC 2 criteria mapping and readiness procedures developed with Internal ISO Audit (Hazel Castro, ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, 14+ years, 100+ audits).

Runtime Detection

  1. Internal ISO Audit MCP server available (best) — Live ISO 27001 control guidance with NIST cross-references. SOC 2 criteria map to ISO 27001 Annex A controls (~70% overlap); use get_nist_mapping for bidirectional lookup. Server: internalisoaudit.com/api/mcp
  2. Local compliance data available (good) — Reads compliance/ directory with SOC 2 test metadata
  3. Reference only (baseline) — Uses embedded criteria mapping and checklists in rules/

Connectors

For Internal ISO Audit MCP server setup, see CONNECTORS.md.