On this pageWhich privacy laws apply to your business in Wyoming?
State Law Practice Note

Wyoming Consumer Privacy Law

Wyoming has no comprehensive consumer-privacy statute. The operative state laws are the data-breach statute (Wyo. Stat. §§ 40-12-501 et seq.), the Wyoming Consumer Protection Act, and a genetic-data privacy chapter, plus the federal overlay.

More details about this document
Editor
, OpenAgreements editor
License
CC BY 4.0
Authorities relied on

Which privacy laws apply to your business in Wyoming?

There is no comprehensive Wyoming consumer-privacy law. Three sectoral state statutes do the work instead: the data-breach statute, which defines a reportable breach as unauthorized acquisition of computerized data that materially compromises personal identifying information and causes or is reasonably believed to cause loss or injury to a Wyoming resident ; the Wyoming Consumer Protection Act, the state's general deceptive-trade-practices law ; and a genetic-data privacy chapter that bars obtaining, testing, retaining, or disclosing genetic data without informed consent .

Wyoming residents have no general state-law rights to access, delete, correct, or port their personal data, no right to opt out of its sale, and businesses face no state notice-at-collection, consent, data-protection-assessment, or processor-contract duties of general application. The state framework is narrower and issue-specific. The breach statute, Wyo. Stat. §§ 40-12-501 through 40-12-511, governs incident response and credit-report security freezes. The Wyoming Consumer Protection Act, §§ 40-12-101 through 40-12-114, supplies the enforcement spine: a business that misrepresents its data practices in connection with a consumer transaction risks a deceptive-trade-practice claim under § 40-12-105 . The genetic-data chapter, §§ 35-32-101 et seq., is Wyoming's one modern consent-based privacy statute, aimed at direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies .

One niche provision is worth knowing: a website operator that publishes arrest photographs and charges for their removal must take down the photograph and associated personal information free of charge within thirty days of a qualifying written request , and a violation is itself an unlawful practice under the Consumer Protection Act.

The rest of a Wyoming privacy program rides the federal and sectoral overlay. Section 5 of the FTC Act reaches deceptive or unfair privacy practices nationwide ; the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act governs financial institutions; HIPAA governs covered health entities and their business associates; and the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act governs services directed to children under 13. Wyoming has also legislated on government data practices — including a 2026 act directed at state-agency handling of resident data — but that legislation regulates public bodies, not private businesses, and does not create consumer-privacy duties for the private sector. A program built to the breach statute, the Consumer Protection Act, the genetic-data chapter, and the federal overlay would upgrade rather than restart if Wyoming later adopted an omnibus privacy statute.

Sources for this answer

Primary law

A.1 Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-501PDF

Wyoming's breach statute defines a breach of the security of the data system as unauthorized acquisition of computerized data that materially compromises personal identifying information and causes or is reasonably believed to cause loss or injury to a Wyoming resident.

"Breach of the security of the data system" means unauthorized acquisition of computerized data that materially compromises the security, confidentiality or integrity of personal identifying information maintained by a person or business and causes or is reasonably believed to cause loss or injury to a resident of this state.

See Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-501(a)(i).

Primary law

A.2 Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-105PDF

The Wyoming Consumer Protection Act makes knowing deceptive trade practices in connection with a consumer transaction unlawful, which is the hook for misrepresented data practices.

A person engages in a deceptive trade practice unlawful under this act when, in the course of his business and in connection with a consumer transaction, he knowingly:

See Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-105(a).

Primary law

A.4 Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-601PDF

A website operator that disseminates arrest photographs and charges for removal must remove a photograph and related personal information without charge within thirty days of a qualifying written request.

A person who operates a website that disseminates photographic records of arrested individuals made by law enforcement agencies as part of routinely documenting an arrest and who charges individuals to remove their photographs shall remove any photograph and related name and personal information from all websites owned or controlled by that person without charging a fee within thirty (30) days of the date of a request to remove the photograph and information if the request:

See Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-601(a).

Primary law

A.5 FTC Act § 5

Section 5 of the FTC Act declares unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce unlawful, which reaches privacy misrepresentations by businesses nationwide.

Unfair methods of competition in or affecting commerce, and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce, are hereby declared unlawful.

See 15 U.S.C. § 45(a)(1).

What must your Wyoming privacy policy contain?

No Wyoming statute requires a general consumer privacy policy or fixes what it must say. The one state-law exception is sectoral: a direct-to-consumer genetic testing company must make available both a high-level privacy-policy overview and a prominent, publicly available privacy notice covering its data collection, consent, use, access, disclosure, transfer, security, retention, and deletion practices . For everyone else, the governing rule is that whatever you publish has to be true — under Section 5 of the FTC Act, and under the Wyoming Consumer Protection Act by the same logic, a policy that misstates how you collect, use, share, or secure data is a deceptive practice .

In practice the drafting question in Wyoming is less what must be included and more whether the policy matches actual practice. Where a sectoral regime applies, that regime supplies the contents: the GLBA privacy-notice rules if you are a financial institution, a COPPA notice if your service is directed to children under 13, and for HIPAA covered entities a notice of privacy practices describing the uses and disclosures of protected health information and the individual's rights . Outside those verticals, follow best practice — describe the categories of data collected, the purposes, the third parties you share with, and how users exercise any choices you offer — and then honor it, because the enforceable obligation is consistency between the statement and the conduct.

For genetic testing companies the Wyoming notice duty is real and specific. The statute splits the disclosure into two layers — an essential-information overview plus a fuller privacy notice — so a single dense legal document likely does not satisfy the text on its own . Build the overview as a short, plain-English summary and keep the complete notice one click away.

Sources for this answer

Primary law

B.1 Wyo. Stat. § 35-32-102(c)(i)PDF

A direct-to-consumer genetic testing company must provide both a high-level privacy-policy overview and a prominent, publicly available privacy notice covering collection, consent, use, access, disclosure, transfer, security, retention, and deletion practices.

To safeguard the privacy, confidentiality, security and integrity of a consumer's genetic data, a direct to consumer genetic testing company shall: (i) Provide clear and complete information regarding the company's policies and procedures for the collection, use or disclosure of genetic data by making available to a consumer: (A) A high-level privacy policy overview that includes essential information about the company's collection, use or disclosure of genetic data; and (B) A prominent, publicly available privacy notice that includes, at a minimum, information about the company's data collection, consent, use, access, disclosure, transfer, security and retention and deletion practices.

See Wyo. Stat. § 35-32-102(c)(i).

Primary law

B.2 FTC Act § 5

Section 5 of the FTC Act declares unfair or deceptive acts or practices unlawful, which reaches a privacy policy that misstates a business's actual data practices.

Unfair methods of competition in or affecting commerce, and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce, are hereby declared unlawful.

See 15 U.S.C. § 45(a)(1).

Primary law

B.3 HIPAA Notice of Privacy Practices

A HIPAA covered entity must give individuals a notice describing the uses and disclosures of their protected health information and their rights and the entity's legal duties.

an individual has a right to adequate notice of the uses and disclosures of protected health information that may be made by the covered entity, and of the individual's rights and the covered entity's legal duties with respect to protected health information

See 45 C.F.R. § 164.520(a)(1).

What must your contracts with vendors say?

Wyoming has no omnibus data-processing-agreement requirement — no state statute prescribes controller-to-processor terms, audit rights, deletion clauses, or subprocessor flow-downs for general commercial contracts. The breach statute does impose one vendor-facing duty: a person that maintains computerized personal identifying information on behalf of another business must disclose any breach of the security of the system to that business as soon as practicable, and the two may agree by contract which of them gives the required consumer notice .

That allocation rule is the reason Wyoming vendor contracts should always name a notification owner: if no agreement is reached, the statute defaults the consumer-notice duty to whichever party has the direct business relationship with the Wyoming resident. The genetic-data chapter takes a similar contract-anchored approach — a third-party provider whose services are limited to storage, retrieval, handling, or transmission of genetic data under a contract or other obligation falls within a statutory exception to the informed-consent requirement, which makes the written service contract the thing that defines the vendor's permitted role .

Where a federal regime is in scope, it supplies the rest of the contracting obligations: the GLBA Safeguards Rule requires financial institutions to oversee service providers and to bind them by contract to implement and maintain appropriate safeguards , and HIPAA requires a written business-associate agreement with mandatory data-protection, breach-reporting, and subcontractor flow-down terms before protected health information changes hands . Outside those verticals, the prudent move is to carry the same protections forward as a matter of best practice — processing limited to documented instructions, confidentiality, reasonable security, prompt breach notification back to your business, and return or deletion of data at the end of the engagement — even though no Wyoming statute compels them.

Sources for this answer

Primary law

C.1 Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-502(g)PDF

A vendor that maintains computerized personal identifying information on another business's behalf must disclose a breach to that business as soon as practicable, and the parties may agree which of them provides the required notice.

Any person who maintains computerized data that includes personal identifying information on behalf of another business entity shall disclose to the business entity for which the information is maintained any breach of the security of the system as soon as practicable following the determination that personal identifying information was, or is reasonably believed to have been, acquired by an unauthorized person. The person who maintains the data on behalf of another business entity and the business entity on whose behalf the data is maintained may agree which person or entity will provide any required notice as provided in subsection (a) of this section, provided only a single notice for each breach of the security of the system shall be required.

See Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-502(g).

Primary law

C.2 Wyo. Stat. § 35-32-102(b)(xi)PDF

The genetic-data chapter excepts from its informed-consent requirement services limited to storage, retrieval, handling, or transmission of genetic data by a third-party service provider acting under a contract.

Services limited to storage, retrieval, handling or transmission of genetic data by a third party service provider pursuant to a contract or other obligation;

See Wyo. Stat. § 35-32-102(b)(xi).

Primary law

C.3 GLBA Safeguards Rule

The GLBA Safeguards Rule requires a financial institution to oversee its service providers, including by requiring them by contract to implement and maintain appropriate safeguards for customer information.

Requiring your service providers by contract to implement and maintain such safeguards

See 16 C.F.R. § 314.4(f)(2).

Primary law

C.4 HIPAA Business Associate Contracts

HIPAA requires a written business-associate contract that establishes the permitted uses and disclosures of protected health information and binds the business associate to safeguard it.

A contract between the covered entity and a business associate must

See 45 C.F.R. § 164.504(e)(2).

What rights do Wyoming consumers have over their personal data?

None of general application — Wyoming law gives consumers no across-the-board rights to access, delete, correct, or port personal data, no right to opt out of its sale or of targeted advertising, and no recognition of universal opt-out signals such as Global Privacy Control. The exceptions are domain-specific. For genetic data, an individual or an authorized representative may inspect, correct, and obtain the individual's genetic data , and a direct-to-consumer genetic testing company must provide a process to access genetic data, delete the account and genetic data, and obtain destruction of the biological sample . For credit data, a consumer may place a security freeze that blocks a consumer reporting agency from releasing the credit report for new-credit purposes without prior authorization .

The genetic-data deletion right has teeth beyond the account-deletion process: any person conducting genetic testing must destroy an individual's genetic data on request, unless the data was obtained under one of the chapter's no-consent exceptions or retention is necessary for a purpose disclosed in the informed consent . A company that wants to keep genetic data after a deletion request therefore needs to point to a disclosed retention purpose in the consent documents themselves — an after-the-fact business justification does not fit the statutory text.

The security-freeze article is consumer-initiated and aimed at identity theft rather than commercial data practices: the consumer requests the freeze, the consumer reporting agency must place it within five business days, and lifts and removals run through an agency-established contact method. It is the closest thing Wyoming law offers to a consumer-controlled switch over data flows, but it applies only to credit reports, not to ordinary marketing or advertising data.

Because there is no omnibus statute, a Wyoming-facing rights program is in practice built to other states' laws and to the sectoral overlay — businesses that honor access and deletion requests nationwide will already exceed what Wyoming law requires for non-genetic data.

Sources for this answer

Primary law

D.1 Wyo. Stat. § 35-32-103(a)PDF

An individual or the individual's authorized representative may inspect, correct, and obtain the individual's genetic data.

An individual or the individual's authorized representative may inspect, correct and obtain genetic data about the individual.

See Wyo. Stat. § 35-32-103(a).

Primary law

D.2 Wyo. Stat. § 35-32-102(c)(v)PDF

A direct-to-consumer genetic testing company must provide a process for a consumer to access genetic data, delete the account and genetic data, and obtain destruction of the biological sample.

Provide a process for a consumer to: (A) Access the consumer's genetic data; (B) Delete the consumer's account and genetic data; and (C) Request and obtain the destruction of the consumer's biological sample.

See Wyo. Stat. § 35-32-102(c)(v).

Primary law

D.4 Wyo. Stat. § 35-32-103(b)PDF

A person conducting genetic testing must destroy an individual's genetic data on request unless the data was obtained under a statutory exception or retention is necessary for a purpose disclosed in the informed consent.

A person conducting genetic testing shall destroy an individual's genetic data upon request by the individual or the individual's authorized representative unless: (i) The data was obtained pursuant to W.S. 35-32-102(b); or (ii) Retention of the data is necessary for a purpose disclosed to the individual or representative in the informed consent.

See Wyo. Stat. § 35-32-103(b).

Primary law

D.3 Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-503(b)PDF

Once a security freeze is in place, a consumer reporting agency may not release the consumer's credit report or information from it for new-credit purposes without the consumer's prior authorization.

If a security freeze is in place, a consumer reporting agency may not release a consumer's credit report or information derived from the credit report to a third party that intends to use the information to determine a consumer's eligibility for credit or the opening of a new account without prior authorization from the consumer.

See Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-503(b).

Do you need consent to collect or share genetic data in Wyoming?

Yes. No person conducting genetic testing may obtain, test, retain, or disclose an individual's genetic data without informed consent, subject to enumerated exceptions such as law enforcement, court orders, paternity determinations, newborn screening, and anonymous research . Direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies face a layered express-consent regime on top of that baseline: initial express consent for the collection itself, plus separate express consent before transferring genetic data to anyone beyond vendors and service providers or using it beyond the primary purpose of the testing service .

The statute adds two more separate-consent tiers: separate express consent to retain a biological sample after the initial testing service is complete , and separate express consent for marketing based on genetic data or based on the consumer having bought a genetic test . Companies must also require valid legal process before disclosing genetic data to law enforcement or any other government agency without the consumer's express written consent, and must maintain a comprehensive security program that protects genetic data against unauthorized access, use, or disclosure .

Two disclosure targets get an absolute written-consent rule: a direct-to-consumer genetic testing company may not disclose a consumer's genetic data to any entity offering health, life, or long-term-care insurance, or to the consumer's employer, without written consent . And none of these company-facing duties can be contracted around — the chapter's provisions applicable to direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies cannot be waived , so a terms-of-service clause purporting to do so is ineffective.

The chapter has a boundary worth checking before building a compliance program around it: it does not apply to protected health information collected by a HIPAA covered entity or business associate . A clinical laboratory operating inside the HIPAA framework is governed by HIPAA's privacy, security, and breach rules rather than this chapter, while a consumer ancestry-and-wellness testing company sits squarely inside the Wyoming statute.

Sources for this answer

Primary law

E.6 Wyo. Stat. § 35-32-102(d)PDF

A direct-to-consumer genetic testing company may not disclose a consumer's genetic data to health, life, or long-term-care insurers, or to the consumer's employer, without the consumer's written consent.

Notwithstanding any other provisions in this section, a direct to consumer genetic testing company shall not disclose a consumer's genetic data to any entity offering health insurance, life insurance or long-term care insurance, or to any employer of the consumer without the consumer's written consent.

See Wyo. Stat. § 35-32-102(d).

Primary law

E.7 Wyo. Stat. § 35-32-105(a)PDF

The genetic-data chapter's provisions applicable to direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies cannot be waived, so contract terms purporting to waive them are ineffective.

The provisions of this chapter applicable to direct to consumer genetic testing companies shall not be waived.

See Wyo. Stat. § 35-32-105(a).

Primary law

E.8 Wyo. Stat. § 35-32-105(b)PDF

The genetic-data chapter does not apply to protected health information collected by a HIPAA covered entity or business associate.

This chapter shall not apply to protected health information that is collected by a covered entity or business associate governed by the privacy, security and breach notification rules issued by the United States Department of Health and Human Services

See Wyo. Stat. § 35-32-105(b).

When must you notify people of a data breach in Wyoming?

An individual or commercial entity that conducts business in Wyoming and owns or licenses computerized personal identifying information about Wyoming residents must, on becoming aware of a breach, conduct a good-faith, reasonable, and prompt investigation into the likelihood of misuse — and if misuse has occurred or is reasonably likely, give notice to affected residents as soon as possible, in the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay . There is no fixed day-count deadline and no Attorney General or consumer-reporting-agency notification trigger in the statute; the clock is the reasonableness standard itself.

The trigger turns on personal identifying information, defined as a first name or first initial and last name combined with one or more of the data elements specified in Wyoming's identity-theft statute, W.S. 6-3-901(b)(iii) through (xiv), when the data elements are not redacted . Information lawfully available from government records or widely distributed media is excluded, and a good-faith acquisition by an employee or agent for business purposes is not a breach if the information is not further misused or disclosed.

Wyoming prescribes the notice's required contents in some detail. The notice must be clear and conspicuous and include, at a minimum, a toll-free contact number that also lets the individual reach the major credit reporting agencies, the types of personal identifying information involved, a general description of the incident, the approximate date of the breach if determinable, a general description of the remedial actions taken, advice to remain vigilant by reviewing account statements and monitoring credit reports, and whether notice was delayed for law enforcement . Notice may be written or by electronic mail, with substitute notice available only where the business shows that notice would cost more than ten thousand dollars for Wyoming-based businesses or two hundred fifty thousand dollars for others, that the affected class exceeds ten thousand or five hundred thousand people respectively, or that it lacks sufficient contact information . Notification may be delayed if a law enforcement agency determines in writing that it would seriously impede a criminal investigation .

Two deemed-compliance paths matter for regulated entities: a HIPAA covered entity or business associate that notifies affected Wyoming customers in compliance with the HIPAA breach rules is deemed compliant with the Wyoming statute , and financial institutions following the federal interagency notice framework referenced in the statute get parallel treatment.

Sources for this answer

Primary law

F.1 Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-502(a)PDF

A business that owns or licenses computerized personal identifying information of Wyoming residents must promptly investigate a suspected breach and, if misuse occurred or is reasonably likely, notify affected residents as soon as possible and without unreasonable delay.

An individual or commercial entity that conducts business in Wyoming and that owns or licenses computerized data that includes personal identifying information about a resident of Wyoming shall, when it becomes aware of a breach of the security of the system, conduct in good faith a reasonable and prompt investigation to determine the likelihood that personal identifying information has been or will be misused. If the investigation determines that the misuse of personal identifying information about a Wyoming resident has occurred or is reasonably likely to occur, the individual or the commercial entity shall give notice as soon as possible to the affected Wyoming resident. Notice shall be made in the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay, consistent with the legitimate needs of law enforcement and consistent with any measures necessary to determine the scope of the breach and to restore the reasonable integrity of the computerized data system.

See Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-502(a).

Primary law

F.2 Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-501(a)(vii)PDF

Personal identifying information under the breach statute is a name combined with one or more unredacted data elements specified in Wyoming's identity-theft statute, W.S. 6-3-901(b)(iii) through (xiv).

"Personal identifying information" means the first name or first initial and last name of a person in combination with one (1) or more of the data elements specified in W.S. 6-3-901(b)(iii) through (xiv), when the data elements are not redacted.

See Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-501(a)(vii).

Primary law

F.3 Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-502(e)PDF

Breach notices must be clear and conspicuous and include, at a minimum, a toll-free contact number, the types of personal identifying information involved, a general description of the incident, the approximate breach date if determinable, the remedial actions taken, vigilance advice, and whether notice was delayed for law enforcement.

Notice required under subsection (a) of this section shall be clear and conspicuous and shall include, at a minimum: (i) A toll-free number: (A) That the individual may use to contact the person collecting the data, or his agent; and (B) From which the individual may learn the toll-free contact telephone numbers and addresses for the major credit reporting agencies. (ii) The types of personal identifying information that were or are reasonably believed to have been the subject of the breach; (iii) A general description of the breach incident; (iv) The approximate date of the breach of security, if that information is reasonably possible to determine at the time notice is provided; (v) In general terms, the actions taken by the individual or commercial entity to protect the system containing the personal identifying information from further breaches; (vi) Advice that directs the person to remain vigilant by reviewing account statements and monitoring credit reports; (vii) Whether notification was delayed as a result of a law enforcement investigation, if that information is reasonably possible to determine at the time the notice is provided.

See Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-502(e).

Primary law

F.4 Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-502(d)(iii)PDF

Substitute notice is available only if the business demonstrates that notice costs would exceed statutory dollar thresholds, that the affected class exceeds statutory volume thresholds, or that it lacks sufficient contact information.

Substitute notice, if the person demonstrates: (A) That the cost of providing notice would exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) for Wyoming-based persons or businesses, and two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000.00) for all other businesses operating but not based in Wyoming; (B) That the affected class of subject persons to be notified exceeds ten thousand (10,000) for Wyoming-based persons or businesses and five hundred thousand (500,000) for all other businesses operating but not based in Wyoming; or (C) The person does not have sufficient contact information.

See Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-502(d)(iii).

Primary law

F.5 Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-502(b)PDF

Breach notification may be delayed if a law enforcement agency determines in writing that notification may seriously impede a criminal investigation.

The notification required by this section may be delayed if a law enforcement agency determines in writing that the notification may seriously impede a criminal investigation.

See Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-502(b).

Primary law

F.6 Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-502(h)PDF

A HIPAA covered entity or business associate that notifies affected Wyoming customers in compliance with the HIPAA breach-notification rules is deemed compliant with the Wyoming breach statute.

A covered entity or business associate that is subject to and complies with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, and the regulations promulgated under that act, 45 C.F.R. Parts 160 and 164, is deemed to be in compliance with this section if the covered entity or business associate notifies affected Wyoming customers or entities in compliance with the requirements of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and 45 C.F.R. Parts 160 and 164.

See Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-502(h).

Can a consumer sue your business under Wyoming privacy law?

Not under the breach statute — enforcement of the notification duty belongs to the Attorney General, who may bring an action in law or equity for compliance, damages, or both . But two other Wyoming statutes do open the courthouse door. The Wyoming Consumer Protection Act lets a person sue for actual damages suffered from an uncured unlawful deceptive trade practice , and the genetic-data chapter gives an individual whose rights were violated a civil action for an injunction and damages after written notice and a sixty-day cure window .

The Consumer Protection Act route is notice-and-cure gated. A practice becomes uncured only after the consumer gives notice to the alleged violator and either no offer to cure is made within fifteen days or the practice is not cured within a reasonable time after the consumer accepts the offer — and the statute imposes short windows, requiring written notice that states the nature of the practice and the actual damage suffered . Class actions are available under § 40-12-108(b), with court-awarded attorney fees determined by the time the attorney reasonably expended rather than by the amount of the judgment .

Public enforcement carries the heavier penalties. The Attorney General — the Act's enforcing authority — can sue to restrain unlawful practices by restraining order or injunction, with additional court orders available to compensate identifiable persons for actual damages or restore money or property , and can seek civil penalties of up to ten thousand dollars per willful violation , rising to fifteen thousand dollars per violation plus mandatory restitution where the practice victimizes an older person or a person with disabilities .

The genetic-data chapter stacks three enforcement layers: a misdemeanor fine, the private civil action with its sixty-day cure period and fee-shifting for prevailing parties , and an Attorney General action — in the name of the state or as parens patriae — carrying a civil penalty of two thousand five hundred dollars per violation plus actual consumer damages and fees . For a direct-to-consumer genetic testing company, the practical exposure is therefore both regulatory and private, and the sixty-day cure window is the moment to fix a violation before litigation attaches.

Sources for this answer

Primary law

G.1 Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-502(f)PDF

The Attorney General enforces the breach-notification statute through actions in law or equity for compliance and damages; the statute creates no consumer private right of action.

The attorney general may bring an action in law or equity to address any violation of this section and for other relief that may be appropriate to ensure proper compliance with this section, to recover damages, or both. The provisions of this section are not exclusive and do not relieve an individual or a commercial entity subject to this section from compliance with all other applicable provisions of law.

See Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-502(f).

Primary law

G.2 Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-108(a)PDF

A person relying on an uncured unlawful deceptive trade practice may sue under the Consumer Protection Act for the damages actually suffered as a consumer.

A person relying upon an uncured unlawful deceptive trade practice may bring an action under this act for the damages he has actually suffered as a consumer as a result of such unlawful deceptive trade practice.

See Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-108(a).

Primary law

G.5 Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-108(b)PDF

A consumer entitled to sue over an uncured unlawful deceptive trade practice may bring a class action, and court-awarded attorney fees are determined by the time reasonably expended rather than by the amount of the judgment.

Any person who is entitled to bring an action under subsection (a) of this section on his own behalf against an alleged violator of this act for damages for an unlawful deceptive trade practice may bring a class action against such person on behalf of any class of persons of which he is a member and which has been damaged by such unlawful deceptive trade practice, subject to and pursuant to the Wyoming Rules of Civil Procedure governing class actions, except as herein expressly provided. If the court determines that actual damages have been suffered by reason of the unlawful deceptive trade practice, the court shall award reasonable attorney's fees to the plaintiffs in a class action under this subsection, provided that such fees shall be determined by the amount of time reasonably expended by the attorney for the plaintiffs and not by the amount of the judgment.

See Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-108(b).

Primary law

G.6 Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-106PDF

The Attorney General may sue to restrain unlawful practices by temporary restraining order or injunction, and the court may enter additional orders to compensate identifiable persons for actual damages or restore money or property.

Whenever the enforcing authority has reasonable cause to believe that any person has engaged in, is engaging in, or is about to engage in any practice which is unlawful under W.S. 40-12-104 or 40-12-105, and that proceedings would be in the public interest, he may bring an action in the name of this state against such person to restrain by temporary restraining order or preliminary or permanent injunction the use of such practice. The action may be brought in the district court of the county in which the person resides or has his principal place of business or in the district court of Laramie county, Wyoming. The district court may issue temporary restraining orders, including ex parte temporary restraining orders, or preliminary or permanent injunctions, in accordance with the principles of equity, to restrain and prevent violations of this act. The court may make such additional orders or judgments as are necessary to compensate identifiable persons for actual damages or restoration of money or property, real or personal, which may have been acquired by means or any act or practice restrained.

See Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-106.

Primary law

G.4 Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-102(a)(ix)PDF

A deceptive trade practice is uncured — and therefore actionable privately — only after consumer notice and either no cure offer within fifteen days or a failure to cure within a reasonable time after acceptance.

"Uncured unlawful deceptive trade practice" means an unlawful deceptive trade practice as defined in W.S. 40-12-105: (A) With respect to which a consumer who has been damaged by the unlawful deceptive trade practice has given notice to the alleged violator pursuant to W.S. 40-12-109; and (B) Either: (I) No offer to cure has been made to such consumer within fifteen (15) days after such notice; or (II) The unlawful deceptive trade practice has not been cured as to such consumer within a reasonable time after his acceptance of the offer to cure.

See Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-102(a)(ix).

Primary law

G.7 Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-113(c)PDF

A willful violation of the Consumer Protection Act carries a civil penalty of up to ten thousand dollars per violation, recoverable by the enforcing authority.

Except as provided in W.S. 40-12-111, any person or agent or employee of the person, who willfully uses, or has willfully used, a method or act, in violation of this act, is liable for a civil penalty of not more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) for each violation. Willful violations occur when the person knew or should have known that the person's conduct was unfair or deceptive.

See Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-113(c).

Primary law

G.8 Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-111(b)PDF

Willful violations that victimize older persons or persons with disabilities require restitution and carry a civil penalty of up to fifteen thousand dollars per violation, recoverable by the Attorney General.

Any person who willfully uses, or has willfully used, a method, act or practice in violation of this act which victimizes or attempts to victimize an older person or a person with disabilities, and commits such violation when the person knew or should have known that the conduct was unfair or deceptive, shall make restitution or reimbursement to the older person or person with disabilities including reasonable attorney fees and costs, and, in addition, is liable for a civil penalty of up to fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000.00) for each violation recoverable by the office of the attorney general.

See Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-111(b).

Primary law

G.3 Wyo. Stat. § 35-32-104(a)-(b)PDF

Violating the genetic-data chapter is a misdemeanor, and an individual whose rights are violated may bring a civil action for an injunction and damages after written notice and a sixty-day cure period, with a prevailing party able to recover costs, expenses, and reasonable attorney fees.

Any person violating the provisions of this chapter is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) for each violation. (b) An individual whose rights have been violated under the provisions of this chapter may bring a civil action to enjoin or restrain any violation of this chapter and may in the same action seek damages from the person violating this chapter. Prior to filing an action under this subsection the individual shall give notice in writing to the alleged violator stating fully the nature of the alleged violation. The alleged violator shall have not more than sixty (60) days from the date notice is provided to cure any violation. If, after sixty (60) days the violation has not been cured, the individual may bring a civil action. A prevailing party in an action brought under this subsection may recover all costs and expenses reasonably associated with the action, including but not limited to reasonable attorney fees.

See Wyo. Stat. § 35-32-104(a)-(b).

Primary law

G.9 Wyo. Stat. § 35-32-104(c)PDF

The Attorney General may enforce the genetic-data chapter in the name of the state or as parens patriae, with a civil penalty of two thousand five hundred dollars per violation plus actual consumer damages and fees.

The attorney general may bring an action in the name of the state or as parens patriae on behalf of consumers to enforce this chapter. In any action brought by the attorney general to enforce this chapter, a person found to have violated this chapter shall be subject to a civil penalty of two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500.00) for each violation, the recovery of actual damages incurred by consumers on whose behalf the action was brought and costs and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by the office of the attorney general.

See Wyo. Stat. § 35-32-104(c).